Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30165254›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Variability and reliability of effective connectivity within the core default mode network: A multi-site longitudinal spectral DCM study.

Hannes Almgren, Frederik Van de Steen, Simone Kühn, Adeel Razi, Karl Friston, Daniele Marinazzo

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spectral imprint of structural embedding in effective connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Test-retest reliability of regression dynamic causal modeling.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannes AlmgrenDepartment of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium. Electronic address: Hannes.Almgren@ugent.be.
Frederik Van de SteenDepartment of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Simone KühnCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany; Clinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Adeel RaziMonash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK; Department of Electronic Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Karl FristonThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Daniele MarinazzoDepartment of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for resting state fMRI - namely spectral DCM - is a recently developed and widely adopted method for inferring effective connectivity in intrinsic brain networks. Most applications of spectral DCM have focused on group-averaged connectivity within large-scale intrinsic brain networks; however, the consistency of subject- and session-specific estimates of effective connectivity has not been evaluated. Establishing reliability (within subjects) is crucial for its clinical use; e.g., as a neurophysiological phenotype of disease progression. Effective connectivity during rest is likely to vary due to changes in cognitive, and physiological states. Quantifying these variations may help understand functional brain architectures - and inform clinical applications. In the present study, we investigated the consistency of effective connectivity within and between subjects, as well as potential sources of variability (e.g., hemispheric asymmetry). We also addressed the effects on consistency of standard data processing procedures. DCM analyses were applied to four longitudinal resting state fMRI datasets. Our sample comprised 17 subjects with 589 resting state fMRI sessions in total. These data allowed us to quantify the robustness of connectivity estimates for each subject, and to generalise our conclusions beyond specific data features. We found that subjects showed systematic and reliable patterns of hemispheric asymmetry. When asymmetry was taken into account, subjects showed very similar connectivity patterns. We also found that various processing procedures (e.g. global signal regression and ROI size) had little effect on inference and the reliability of connectivity estimates for the majority of subjects. Finally, Bayesian model reduction significantly increased the consistency of connectivity patterns.

Indexed as

AdultBayes TheoremBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultDynamic causal modellingEffective connectivityfMRILongitudinal designsReliabilityResting stateVariability

Identifiers

PMID30165254
PMCPMC6215332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.