Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30161262›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

A simple computer vision pipeline reveals the effects of isolation on social interaction dynamics in Drosophila.

Guangda Liu, Tanmay Nath, Gerit A Linneweber, Annelies Claeys, Zhengyu Guo, Jin Li, Mercedes Bengochea, Steve De Backer, Barbara Weyn, Manu Sneyders and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TransgenicCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sleep inFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Guangda LiuVIB Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
Tanmay NathIMEC-Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gerit A LinneweberVIB Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8393-6426
Annelies ClaeysVIB Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
Zhengyu GuoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering & TEES-AgriLife Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Systems Engineering (CBGSE), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Jin LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering & TEES-AgriLife Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Systems Engineering (CBGSE), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Mercedes BengocheaInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière (ICM) - Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6446-5021
Steve De BackerDCILabs, Keerbergen, Belgium.
Barbara WeynDCILabs, Keerbergen, Belgium.
Manu SneydersPeira bvba, Turnhout, Belgium.
Hans NicasyPeira bvba, Turnhout, Belgium.
Peng YuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering & TEES-AgriLife Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Systems Engineering (CBGSE), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Paul ScheundersIMEC-Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bassem A HassanVIB Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRTexas A&M University · USAZ Turnhout · BEPromotie Binnenvaart Vlaanderen · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolation profoundly influences social behavior in all animals. In humans, isolation has serious effects on health. Drosophila melanogaster is a powerful model to study small-scale, temporally-transient social behavior. However, longer-term analysis of large groups of flies is hampered by the lack of effective and reliable tools. We built a new imaging arena and improved the existing tracking algorithm to reliably follow a large number of flies simultaneously. Next, based on the automatic classification of touch and graph-based social network analysis, we designed an algorithm to quantify changes in the social network in response to prior social isolation. We observed that isolation significantly and swiftly enhanced individual and local social network parameters depicting near-neighbor relationships. We explored the genome-wide molecular correlates of these behavioral changes and found that whereas behavior changed throughout the six days of isolation, gene expression alterations occurred largely on day one. These changes occurred mostly in metabolic genes, and we verified the metabolic changes by showing an increase of lipid content in isolated flies. In summary, we describe a highly reliable tracking and analysis pipeline for large groups of flies that we use to unravel the behavioral, molecular and physiological impact of isolation on social network dynamics in Drosophila.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalComputersDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsInterpersonal RelationsPopulation SurveillanceSocial BehaviorSocial IsolationSoftwareDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30161262
PMCPMC6135522
OpenAlexW2888818404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.