Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30161250›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Modulation of motor excitability by cortical optogenetic theta burst stimulation.

Chun-Wei Wu, Wen-Tai Chiu, Tsung-Hsun Hsieh, Cho-Han Hsieh, Jia-Jin Jason Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06775145 (Therapeutic Effect of Neuromodulation on Anxiety Disorders by High-Definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06775145 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Effect of Neuromodulation on Anxiety Disorders by High-Definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)ArmsHD-R_cDC+cTBS & sham-L_aDC+iTBS, sham-R_cDC+cTBS & HD-L_aDC+iTBS, HD-R_cDC+cTBS & HD-L_aDC+iTBS, sham-R_cDC+cTBS & sham-L_aDC+iTBS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Spinal cord representation of motor cortex plasticity reflects corticospinal tract LTP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Neurostimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chun-Wei WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wen-Tai ChiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Tsung-Hsun HsiehSchool of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cho-Han HsiehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jia-Jin Jason ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
National Cheng Kung University · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) are protocols used in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or cortical electrical stimulation (CES) to facilitate or suppress corticospinal excitability. However, rTMS and CES excite all types of neuron in the target cortex probed by the coil or electrode, making it difficult to differentiate the effect of TBS on specific neural circuits involved in motor plasticity. In this study, TBS protocols were converted into an optogenetic model to achieve focalized and cell-type-specific cortical modulation. Light-sensitive channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) was expressed in the glutamatergic neuron in the primary motor cortex (M1) driven by the CaMKIIα promoter. A custom-made optrode comprising an optical fiber and a metal cannula electrode was fabricated to achieve optogenetic stimulation and simultaneous local field potential (LFP) recording. Single-pulse CES was delivered into M1 to elicit motor-evoked potential (MEP), which served as an indicator of motor excitability, before and after TBS intervention. Results show that both CES-iTBS and optogenetic iTBS (Opto-iTBS) can potentiate MEP activity. However, CES-cTBS suppressed MEP activity whereas Opto-cTBS enhanced it. This discrepancy may have resulted from the different neural networks targeted by the two TBS modalities, with CES-cTBS exciting all types of neuron and Opto-cTBS targeting excitatory neuron specifically. The results support the idea that intra-cortical networks determine the variation of TBS-induced neuroplasticity. This study shows that focalized and cell-type-specific brain stimulation using the optogenetic approach is viable and can be extended for further exploration of neuroplasticity.

Indexed as

OptogeneticsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAnimalsCortical ExcitabilityElectrodes, ImplantedEvoked Potentials, MotorMaleMotor CortexRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTheta Rhythm

Identifiers

PMID30161250
PMCPMC6117070
OpenAlexW2888982898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.