Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30161236›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Differences in the viral genome between HPV-positive cervical and oropharyngeal cancer.

Bailey A LeConte, Peter Szaniszlo, Susan M Fennewald, Dianne I Lou, Suimin Qiu, Nai-Wei Chen, John H Lee, Vicente A Resto

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Vaccine prevention of HPV-associated diseases].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Circular RNA-based HPV16 therapeutic vaccine elicits potent and durable antitumor immunity.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bailey A LeConteDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Peter SzaniszloDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3565-0957
Susan M FennewaldDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Dianne I LouDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Suimin QiuDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Nai-Wei ChenDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7969-8805
John H LeeDepartment of Adult Medical Affairs, Chan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine, Culver City, California, United States of America.
Vicente A RestoDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Physiologic Study of Lymphatic MetastasisK08CA132988 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI RESTO, VICENTE ANDRES · 2009 to 2013
$795k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA132988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States has steadily increased in the past decades and has now become the most frequently diagnosed HPV-associated cancer type, surpassing cervical cancer. Variations in the HPV genome correlate with tumorigenic risk, and the distribution of genetic variants is extensively studied in cervical cancer, but very little is known about new mutations or the distribution of HPV types and variants in oropharyngeal cancer. Here we present an archival tissue cohort study that compares genomic characteristics of HPV associated with cervical versus oropharyngeal tumors using DNA sequence analysis. We found HPV16 to be more prevalent in oropharyngeal samples than in cervical samples (91.2% versus 52.9%), while HPV18 (1.5% versus 18.2%) and HPV45 (0.7% versus 9.9%) were much less prevalent. Differences between cervix and oropharynx in HPV16 variants distribution were more subtle, but the combined European + Asian (EUR+AS) variant group was more prevalent (90.2% versus 71.4%), while the American Asian 1 + American Asian 2 (AA1+AA2) variant group was much less prevalent (4.4% versus 22.5%) in oropharyngeal cancers. HPV prevalence in oropharyngeal cancers showed an increasing trend from 60% in 2003 to 80% in 2016. We also identified over nine times more nonsynonymous mutations in the HPV E6 gene amplified from oropharyngeal samples, but for E7 the difference in mutation rates between the two anatomical locations was not significant. Overall, we showed that HPV genome in oropharyngeal cancer presents important differences when compared to cervical cancer and this may explain the distinct pathomechanisms and susceptibility to treatment of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralFemaleGenome, ViralHuman papillomavirus 16HumansOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsSequence Analysis, DNAUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID30161236
PMCPMC6117069
OpenAlexW2889494305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.