Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30161213›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

'We pledge to improve the health of our entire community': Improving health worker motivation and performance in Bihar, India through teamwork, recognition, and non-financial incentives.

Carolyn Grant, Dipty Nawal, Sai Mala Guntur, Manish Kumar, Indrajit Chaudhuri, Christine Galavotti, Tanmay Mahapatra, Kunal Ranjan, Gangesh Kumar, Sunil Mohanty and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolyn GrantSexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, CARE USA, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-5075
Dipty NawalCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Sai Mala GunturCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Manish KumarCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Indrajit ChaudhuriJeevika Technical Support Program, Project Concern International, Patna, Bihar, India.
Christine GalavottiSexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, CARE USA, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Tanmay MahapatraCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Kunal RanjanCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Gangesh KumarCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Sunil MohantyCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Mohammed Aftab AlamCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Aritra DasCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Patna, Bihar, India.
Safia JiwaniDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Care India · INCARE USA · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotivation is critical to health worker performance and work quality. In Bihar, India, frontline health workers provide essential health services for the state's poorest citizens. Yet, there is a shortfall of motivated and skilled providers and a lack of coordination between two cadres of frontline health workers and their supervisors. CARE India developed an approach aimed at improving health workers' performance by shifting work culture and strengthening teamwork and motivation. The intervention-"Team-Based Goals and Incentives"-supported health workers to work as teams towards collective goals and rewarded success with public recognition and non-financial incentives.

methodsThirty months after initiating the intervention, 885 health workers and 98 supervisors completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire in 38 intervention and 38 control health sub-centers in one district. The questionnaire included measures of social cohesion, teamwork attitudes, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, teamwork behaviors, equitable service delivery, taking initiative, and supervisory support. We conducted bivariate analyses to examine the impact of the intervention on these psychosocial and behavioral outcomes.

resultsResults show statistically significant differences across several measures between intervention and control frontline health workers, including improved teamwork (mean = 8.8 vs. 7.3), empowerment (8.5 vs. 7.4), job satisfaction (7.1 vs. 5.99) and equitable service delivery (6.7 vs. 4.99). While fewer significant differences were found for supervisors, they reported improved teamwork (8.4 vs. 5.3), and frontline health workers reported improved fulfillment of supervisory duties by their supervisors (8.9 vs. 7.6). Both frontline health workers and supervisors found public recognition and enhanced teamwork more motivating than the non-financial incentives.

conclusionsThe Team-Based Goals and Incentives model reinforces intrinsic motivation and supports improvements in the teamwork, motivation, and performance of health workers. It offers an approach to practitioners and governments for improving the work environment in a resource-constrained setting and where there are multiple cadres of health workers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMotivationWork PerformanceAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaJob SatisfactionModels, PsychologicalRewardSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID30161213
PMCPMC6117047
OpenAlexW2888864426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.