Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30161208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Qualitative assessment of facilitators and barriers to HIV programme implementation by community health workers in Mopani district, South Africa.

Nireshni Naidoo, Nkosinathi Zuma, N Sellina Khosa, Gert Marincowitz, Jean Railton, Nthabiseng Matlakala, Geoffrey A Jobson, Jude O Igumbor, James A McIntyre, Helen E Struthers and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health literacy of Sesotho-speaking patients diagnosed with chronic conditions in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nireshni NaidooAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nkosinathi ZumaAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
N Sellina KhosaAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Gert MarincowitzMopani DCST, Department of Health, Limpopo Province, Giyani, South Africa.
Jean RailtonAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nthabiseng MatlakalaAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Geoffrey A JobsonAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jude O IgumborDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
James A McIntyreAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Helen E StruthersAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Remco P H PetersAnova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2124-7275

Funding

Wits-UNC Partnership: Expanding Capacity in HIV Implementation Science in South AfricaD43TW009774 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PETTIFOR, AUDREY, RAMASWAMY, ROHIT · 2014 to 2023
$3.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009774PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

South Africa has implemented a community-based HIV programme (CBHP) in its primary healthcare (PHC) re-engineering strategy that aims to improve public healthcare delivery. This CBHP is delivered by ward-based outreach teams (WBOTs); provision of community HIV services comprises an important component of this programme. We conducted an exploratory study to determine the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of this CBHP in rural Mopani District, South Africa. Focus group discussions were conducted with the community health workers (CHWs) and PHC nurses; participant interviews were conducted with community members who access these health services, community leaders, and social workers. We conducted a thematic content analysis and based on the key themes reported, we identified the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, consisting of five domains, as the most appropriate model to interpret our findings. First, in terms of intervention characteristics, community members generally valued the HIV services provided, but the variable needs impacted on programme implementation. Outer setting challenges include inability to meet the need of patients as a result of stigma, non-disclosure of HIV status and social factors. In terms of the inner setting, CHWs were grateful for the equipment and training received but expressed the need for better support of management and the provision of additional resources. With regard to characteristics of the implementers, the CHWs expressed the desire for further training despite reporting having sufficient knowledge to conduct their HIV work. Finally, in terms of the implementation process, the importance of relationship building between CHWs and community members was emphasised. In conclusion, these data underline the positive receipt and potential of the CBHP in this rural district and identify areas to further strengthen the programme. The success and sustainability of the CBHP requires ongoing commitment of resources, training, supervision, and organisational support in order to operate effectively and efficiently.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersDelivery of Health CarePrimary Health CareAttitude of Health PersonnelDisclosureFocus GroupsHealth CommunicationHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicNursesPatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementSocial StigmaSocial Workers

Identifiers

PMID30161208
PMCPMC6117027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.