Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30161206›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Role of maternal preconception nutrition on offspring growth and risk of stunting across the first 1000 days in Vietnam: A prospective cohort study.

Melissa F Young, Phuong Hong Nguyen, Ines Gonzalez Casanova, O Yaw Addo, Lan Mai Tran, Son Nguyen, Reynaldo Martorell, Usha Ramakrishnan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa F YoungHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2768-1673
Phuong Hong NguyenInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3418-1674
Ines Gonzalez CasanovaHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
O Yaw AddoHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Lan Mai TranInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Son NguyenInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Reynaldo MartorellHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Usha RamakrishnanHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence supports the role of preconception maternal nutritional status (PMNS) on birth outcomes; however, evidence of relationships with child growth are limited. We examined associations between PMNS (height, weight and body mass index- BMI) and offspring growth during the first 1000 days. We used prospective cohort data from a randomized-controlled trial of preconception micronutrient supplementation in Vietnam, PRECONCEPT (n = 1409). Poisson regression models were used to examine associations between PMNS and risk of offspring stunting (<-2 HAZ) at 2 years. We used path analytic models to examine associations with PMNS on fetal growth (ultrasound measurements) and offspring HAZ at birth and 2 years. All models were adjusted for child age, sex, gestational weight gain, education, socioeconomic status and treatment group. A third of women had a preconception height < 150cm or weight < 43 kg. Women with preconception height < 150 cm or a weight < 43 kg were at increased risk of having a stunted child at 2 years (incident risk ratio IRR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.51-2.28; IRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.65, respectively). While the traditional low BMI cut-off (< 18.5 kg/m2) was not significant, lower BMI cut-offs (< 17.5 kg/m2 or < 18.0 kg/m2) were significantly associated with 1.3 times increased risk of child stunting. In path models, PMNS were positively associated with fetal growth (ultrasound measurements) and offspring HAZ at birth and 2 years. For each 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in maternal height and weight, offspring HAZ at 2 years increased by 0.30 SD and 0.23 SD, respectively. In conclusion, PMNS influences both offspring linear growth and risk of stunting across the first 1000 days. These findings underscore the importance of expanding the scope of current policies and strategies to include the preconception period in order to reduce child stunting.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultBody HeightBody Mass IndexBody WeightChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsFemaleFetal DevelopmentGrowth DisordersHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMicronutrientsRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID30161206
PMCPMC6117029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.