Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30161203›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Algorithm for resolving discrepancies between claims for smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy and smoking status in delivery records: The impact on estimates of utilisation.

Lucinda Roper, Duong Thuy Tran, Kristjana Einarsdóttir, David B Preen, Alys Havard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucinda RoperCentre for Big Data Research in Health (CBDRH), UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-5295
Duong Thuy TranCentre for Big Data Research in Health (CBDRH), UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kristjana EinarsdóttirCentre of Public Health Sciences and Unit for Nutrition Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
David B PreenCentre for Health Services Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Alys HavardCentre for Big Data Research in Health (CBDRH), UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe linkage of routine data collections are valuable for population-based evaluation of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy in pregnancy where little is known about the utilisation or safety of these pharmacotherapies antenatally. The use of routine data collections to study smoking cessation pharmacotherapy is limited by disparities among data sources. This study developed an algorithm to resolve disparity between the evidence of pharmacotherapy utilisation for smoking cessation and the recording of smoking in pregnancy, examined its face validity and assessed the implications on estimates of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy utilisation.

methodsPerinatal records (n = 1,098,203) of women who gave birth in the Australian States of Western Australia and New South Wales (2004-2012) were linked to hospital admissions and pharmaceutical dispensing data. An algorithm, based on dispensing information about the type of smoking therapy, timing and quantity of supply reclassified certain groups of women as smoking during pregnancy. Face validity of the algorithm was tested by examining the distribution of factors associated with inaccurate recording of smoking status among women that the algorithm classified as misreporting smoking in pregnancy. Rate of utilisation among smokers, according to original and reclassified smoking status, was measured, to demonstrate the utility of the algorithm.

resultsSmoking cessation pharmacotherapy were dispensed to 2184 women during pregnancy, of those 1013 women were originally recorded as non-smoking as per perinatal and hospital data. Application of the algorithm reclassified 730 women as smoking during pregnancy. The algorithm satisfied the test of face validity-the expected demographic factors of marriage, private hospital delivery and higher socioeconomic status, were more common in women whom the algorithm identified as misreporting their smoking status. Application of the algorithm resulted in smoking cessation pharmacotherapy utilisation estimates ranging from 2.3-3.6% of all pregnancies.

conclusionResearchers can use the algorithm presented herein to improve the identification of smoking among women who use cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy. Improved identification can improve the validity of safety analyses of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy-providing clinicians with valuable evidence to use when counselling women on the role of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation during pregnancy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSmoking CessationAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansModels, BiologicalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalenceSmokingSmoking Cessation AgentsSocioeconomic FactorsSmoking Cessation Agents

Identifiers

PMID30161203
PMCPMC6117013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.