ArticleEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2018
Differences in risk factor-colorectal adenoma associations according to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.
Article in European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Dietary Fibre Intake and Colorectal Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Publication trends and hotspots of colorectal adenoma during 2002-2022: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBecause multiple observational studies and large, randomized controlled trials indicate that NSAIDs strongly reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasms, we investigated whether NSAID use masks associations of various other risk factors with colorectal neoplasms. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing pooled data from three case-control studies of incident, sporadic colorectal adenoma (pooled n=789 cases, 2035 polyp-free controls), using multivariable logistic regression, we investigated various risk factor-colorectal adenoma associations stratified by NSAID use.
resultsExample multivariable-adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for those in the highest relative to the lowest quartiles of exposure, by regular nonaspirin NSAID nonuse/use, respectively, were 1.57 (95% CI: 0.96-2.55) versus 1.14 (95% CI: 0.37, 3.49) for total fat, 1.37 (95% CI: 0.86-2.18) versus 0.70 (95% CI: 0.23-2.25) for saturated fat, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.68-1.28) versus 1.30 (95% CI: 0.61-2.75) for calcium, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.64-1.23) versus 1.38 (95% CI: 0.65-2.94) for total fruits and vegetables, and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.65-1.11) versus 0.94 (95% CI: 0.52-1.71) for physical activity. For current versus never smokers, the odds ratios (95% CIs) among regular non-NSAID users/nonusers were 2.91 (95% CI: 2.22-3.82) versus 1.75 (95% CI: 0.90-3.41), respectively, and for those who were obese versus those who were normal weight, they were 1.67 (95% CI: 1.28-2.17) versus 1.19 (95% CI: 0.69-2.04), respectively.
conclusionOur findings suggest that regular nonaspirin NSAID use may mask, beyond simple confounding, associations of major risk factors with colorectal adenoma, and support routinely assessing such associations stratified by regular nonaspirin NSAID use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.