ArticleAnnals of medicine2019
A new prediction model for assessing the clinical outcomes of ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a decision tree analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between the geriatric nutritional risk index and all-cause mortality in older critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Impact of sleep duration and dietary patterns on risk of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and elderly adults: a cross-sectional study from a survey in Anhui, Eastern China.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Article
- Aspirin reduces the mortality risk of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of in-ICU mortality in pneumonia patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a survival prediction model in elder patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a MIMIC-population-based study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Observational
- Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Prediction of Disease Outcomes for COVID-19 and Pneumonia Patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Hyperchloremia in critically ill patients: association with outcomes and prediction using electronic health record data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Hyperchloremia in Critically Ill Patients.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2019Article
- An attention based deep learning model of clinical events in the intensive care unit.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to develop a new scoring index based on decision-tree analysis to predict clinical outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsData of 3519 ICU patients with CAP were obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC III) 2001-2012 database and analysed between 30-d survivors and non-survivors. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the new decision tree model were compared with those of CURB-65 and SOAR.
resultsThe newly developed classification and regression tree (CART) model identified coexisting illnesses as the most important single discriminating factor between survivors and non-survivors. The CART model area under the curve (AUC) 0.661 was superior to that of CURB-65 (0.609) and SOAR (0.589). CART sensitivity was 73.4%, and specificity 49.0%. CURB-65 and SOAR sensitivity for predicting 30-d mortality were 74.5 and 80.7%, and specificity was 42.3 and 33.9%, respectively. After smoothing, the CART model had higher sensitivity and specificity than both CURB-65 and SOAR.
conclusionsThe new CART prediction model has higher specificity and better receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves than CURB-65 and SOAR score indices although its accuracy and sensitivity are only moderately better than the other systems. Key messages The new CART prediction model has higher specificity and better ROC curves than CURB-65 and SOAR score indices. However, accuracy and sensitivity of the new CART prediction model are only moderately better than the other systems in predicting 30-day mortality in CAP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.