Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30160553›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2019

A new prediction model for assessing the clinical outcomes of ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a decision tree analysis.

Shufang Zhang, Kai Zhang, Yang Yu, Baoping Tian, Wei Cui, Gensheng Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using Machine Learning to Predict Hyperchloremia in Critically Ill Patients.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shufang Zhanga Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital , Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou , Zhejiang , PR China.
Kai Zhangb Department of Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital , Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou , Zhejiang , PR China.
Yang Yub Department of Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital , Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou , Zhejiang , PR China.
Baoping Tianb Department of Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital , Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou , Zhejiang , PR China.
Wei Cuib Department of Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital , Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou , Zhejiang , PR China.
Gensheng Zhangb Department of Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital , Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou , Zhejiang , PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to develop a new scoring index based on decision-tree analysis to predict clinical outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsData of 3519 ICU patients with CAP were obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC III) 2001-2012 database and analysed between 30-d survivors and non-survivors. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the new decision tree model were compared with those of CURB-65 and SOAR.

resultsThe newly developed classification and regression tree (CART) model identified coexisting illnesses as the most important single discriminating factor between survivors and non-survivors. The CART model area under the curve (AUC) 0.661 was superior to that of CURB-65 (0.609) and SOAR (0.589). CART sensitivity was 73.4%, and specificity 49.0%. CURB-65 and SOAR sensitivity for predicting 30-d mortality were 74.5 and 80.7%, and specificity was 42.3 and 33.9%, respectively. After smoothing, the CART model had higher sensitivity and specificity than both CURB-65 and SOAR.

conclusionsThe new CART prediction model has higher specificity and better receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves than CURB-65 and SOAR score indices although its accuracy and sensitivity are only moderately better than the other systems. Key messages The new CART prediction model has higher specificity and better ROC curves than CURB-65 and SOAR score indices. However, accuracy and sensitivity of the new CART prediction model are only moderately better than the other systems in predicting 30-day mortality in CAP patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDecision TreesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMortalityOutcome Assessment, Health CarePneumoniaPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsSensitivity and Specificitycommunity-acquired pneumoniaIntensive caremortality

Identifiers

PMID30160553
PMCPMC7857467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.