Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159945›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Affective interoceptive inference: Evidence from heart-beat evoked brain potentials.

Antje Gentsch, Alejandra Sel, Amanda C Marshall, Simone Schütz-Bosbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neural Sensitivity to the Heartbeat Is Modulated by Fluctuations in Affective Arousal during Spontaneous Thought.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interoceptive rhythms in the brain.Nature neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antje GentschDepartment of Psychology, General and Experimental Psychology Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Alejandra SelDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-8833
Amanda C MarshallDepartment of Psychology, General and Experimental Psychology Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Simone Schütz-BosbachDepartment of Psychology, General and Experimental Psychology Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Bial Foundation 44/16Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHU 2471/5-1Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Volkswagen Stiftung AZ II/85 068/85 158/85 159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of internal bodily signals (interoception) is central to many theories of emotion and embodied cognition. According to recent theoretical views, the sensory processing of visceral signals such as one's own heartbeat is determined by top-down predictions about the expected interoceptive state of the body (interoceptive inference). In this EEG study we examined neural responses to heartbeats following expected and unexpected emotional stimuli. We used a modified stimulus repetition task in which pairs of facial expressions were presented with repeating or alternating emotional content, and we manipulated the emotional valence and the likelihood of stimulus repetition. We found that affective predictions of external socially relevant information modulated the heartbeat-evoked potential, a marker of cardiac interoception. Crucially, the HEP changes highly relied on the expected emotional content of the facial expression. Thus, expected negative faces led to a decreased HEP amplitude, whereas such an effect was not observed after an expected neutral face. These results suggest that valence-specific affective predictions, and their uniquely associated predicted bodily sensory state, can reduce or amplify cardiac interoceptive responses. In addition, the affective repetition effects were dependent on repetition probability, highlighting the influence of top-down exteroceptive predictions on interoception. Our results are in line with recent models of interoception supporting the idea that predicted bodily states influence sensory processing of salient external information.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionSocial PerceptionAdultCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFacial RecognitionFemaleHeart RateHumansInteroceptionMaleProbabilityYoung Adultemotionheartbeat-evoked potentialHEPinteroceptionprediction

Identifiers

PMID30159945
PMCPMC6865546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.