Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159831›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2019

Robotic radical prostatectomy after aborted prostatectomy: still feasible? The experience from a tertiary care center.

Jaya Sai Chavali, Juan Garisto, Riccardo Bertolo, Jose Agudelo, Julien Dagenais, Jihad Kaouk

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaya Sai ChavaliGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Q10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Juan GaristoGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Q10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Riccardo BertoloGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Q10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0260-4601
Jose AgudeloGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Q10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Julien DagenaisGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Q10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Jihad KaoukGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Q10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. kaoukj@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To describe the surgical management of patients who had radical prostatectomy previously attempted but aborted due to diverse causes. Patients who underwent an "aborted prostatectomy" were extracted from the institutional prostatectomy database. A description of the tailored robotic approach was reported for each case. Tips and tricks for the accomplishment of robotic prostatectomy after aborted prostatectomy were reported. Six clinical cases were analyzed. Three patients had aborted prostatectomy due to complicated dissection hindered by pelvic mesh and bowel adhesions; one prostatectomy was aborted due to anesthesiology/respiratory matters; one for narrow pelvis; one due to abnormal pelvic vascular anatomy. All patients successfully underwent robotic prostatectomy at our institution. In five patients, standard transperitoneal robotic approach was performed. In one patient, robotic transperineal approach was mandatory. Median operative time was 282 min (86-460). Median estimated blood loss was 325 mL (50-1000). Two patients had positive surgical margins. One patient was found with nodal metastasis at final pathology. Neither perioperative nor postoperative complications were reported. At last follow-up, PSA was undetectable in 5/6 patients. Even after previous aborted prostatectomy, robot-assisted prostatectomy is feasible, with acceptable results. The case-by-case tailoring of the technique is the key for a successful intervention.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsReoperationRobotic Surgical ProceduresTertiary Care CentersTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeAbortedAlternative approachRadical prostatectomyRedoRobot-assistedSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID30159831
OpenAlexW2889349109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.