Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159819›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2018

Neurolysin: From Initial Detection to Latest Advances.

Frédéric Checler, Emer S Ferro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neurolysin Knockout Mice in a Diet-Induced Obesity Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Peptidome: Chaos or Inevitability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Frédéric CheclerUniversité Côte d'Azur, INSERM, CNRS, IPMC, UMR7275, Team Labeled «Laboratory of Excellence (Labex) DISTALZ», 660 Route des Lucioles, 06560, Sophia-Antipolis, Valbonne, France. checler@ipmc.cnrs.fr.
Emer S FerroDepartment of Pharmacology, Biomedical Science Institute, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 1524, Sala 317, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Inserm · FRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms by which peptidergic signals are terminated have been the center of multiple studies leading to the discoveries of novel proteolytic activities. When studying the catabolic fate of neurotensin (NT) in brain and gastrointestinal tract, we detected a novel activity belonging to the metallopeptidases class and apparently distinct from previously known enzymes. Purification and cloning confirmed that this NT-degrading neutral metalloendopeptidase activity was indeed original. It was named endopeptidase 3.4.24.16 according to the IUBMB nomenclature and later, referred to as neurolysin. This review tells the history of neurolysin from its initial detection to its purification, cloning, design of specific inhibitors as well as in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies aimed at delineating its role in the control of NT function. Finally, we discuss very recent advances suggesting a potential role of neurolysin in pathologies.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBrainGastrointestinal TractHumansMetalloendopeptidasesNeurotensinPeptide FragmentsMetalloendopeptidasesneurolysinNeurotensinPeptide FragmentsNeurolysinNeurotensinPathologiesPeptidasesPeptides degradation

Identifiers

PMID30159819
OpenAlexW2889244502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.