Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159738›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Single intra-articular injection of lightly cross-linked hyaluronic acid reduces knee pain in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Stephanie C Petterson, Kevin D Plancher

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07487038 (Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Dose Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Adults With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07487038 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Dose Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Adults With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorFatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled133ConditionsKnee Osteoarthristis, Hyaluronic AcidArmsIntra-articular hyaluronic acid injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis or osteoarthritis.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie C PettersonOrthopaedic Foundation, 2777 Summer Street, Suite 500, Stamford, CT, 06905, USA.
Kevin D PlancherAlbert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Hospital, Plancher Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 1160 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10128, USA. kplancher@plancherortho.com.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary objective was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Monovisc™ in the relief of joint pain in patients with idiopathic knee OA compared to saline injection. It was hypothesized that patient success, defined as ≥ 50% improvement from baseline and ≥ 20 mm absolute improvement from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, would be greater in the Monovisc™ group compared to the Saline control group.

methodsIn this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with idiopathic, symptomatic, knee OA were randomized to either 4 ml single injection of Monovisc™ or 4 ml injection of 0.9% saline. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to assess patient outcomes at 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, and 26 weeks post-injection. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a 50% improvement and ≥ 20 mm improvement from baseline in the WOMAC pain through 26 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included a ≥ 20 mm improvement from baseline on the WOMAC physical function, patient global assessment, evaluator global assessment, and knee range of motion.

results369 patients (154 male, 215 female) were randomized to either Monovisc™ or saline. The Monovisc™ group had a significantly greater rate of patient success (e.g. ≥ 50% improvement and ≥ 20 mm absolute improvement from baseline in the WOMAC pain through Week 26) compared to saline (p = 0.043).

conclusionsMonovisc™, a single-injection intra-articular HA device, is a safe and effective treatment for providing a clinically meaningful reduction in knee pain within 2 weeks. The results of this study support the use of a single injection of hyaluronic acid (Monovisc™) for patients with symptomatic knee OA in patients older than 45 years, as a safe and effective alternative for patients who may want an alternative treatment modality or may not be candidates for partial or total knee replacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdultAgedArthralgiaCross-Linking ReagentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularAdjuvants, ImmunologicCross-Linking ReagentsHyaluronic AcidHyaluronic acidIntra-articular injectionKnee joint painKnee osteoarthritisMonovisc™

Identifiers

PMID30159738
OpenAlexW2889038928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.