Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159534›Full record

ArticlePlant diversity2017

Center for Plant Conservation's Best Practice Guidelines for the reintroduction of rare plants.

Joyce Maschinski, Matthew A Albrecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant diversity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Seedling Establishment ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bi-Pinnate CompoundBiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Burrowing activity of coconut rhinoceros beetle on Guam cycads.Communicative & integrative biology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joyce MaschinskiCenter for Plant Conservation, San Diego Zoo Global, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Rd., Escondido, CA 92027, USA.
Matthew A AlbrechtCenter for Conservation & Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent estimates indicate that one-fifth of botanical species worldwide are considered at risk of becoming extinct in the wild. One available strategy for conserving many rare plant species is reintroduction, which holds much promise especially when carefully planned by following guidelines and when monitored long-term. We review the

Indexed as

FoundersGeneticsManaged relocationMonitoringOptimal site selectionReintroduction

Identifiers

PMID30159534
PMCPMC6112315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.