ArticlePlant diversity2017
Complementarities of two existing intermediate conservation approaches.
Article in Plant diversity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Group Membership With Residents Mediates Reinforcement Outcomes for a Translocated Bird.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- From assembly inference to co-occurrence organization: conservation contexts are associated with gut bacterial variation in the endangeredFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Inter situ collections as a strategy to conserve an exceptional plant species from the Amazon rainforest.PloS one · 2026Article
- Optimization of Propagation of the Polish Strain ofBiology · 2022Article
- Conditional Seed Dormancy HelpsPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- An early evaluation of translocation actions for endangered plant species on Mediterranean islands.Plant diversity · 2019Article
- Species diversity in restoration plantings: Important factors for increasing the diversity of threatened tree species in the restoration of the Araucaria forest ecosystem.Plant diversity · 2019Article
- Conserving plants within and beyond protected areas - still problematic and future uncertain.Plant diversity · 2019Review
- Recovery of threatened plant species and their habitats in the biodiversity hotspot of the Southwest Australian Floristic Region.Plant diversity · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The need for integration of ex situ and in situ approaches in conservation of plants has long been recognized. However, ex situ collections have numerous limitations that reduce their utility for conservation, necessitating the introduction of new, more appropriate, flexible and less costly approaches. Two new approaches that can be called "intermediate" between in situ and ex situ, and bridging them in some way have been proposed over the last two decades. In these approaches material collected in natural populations is planted and maintained outside the original location, but with a different purpose. While the purpose of the inter situs approach is reintroduction, the concern of the quasi in situ approach is long-term storage of species genetic diversity. I view these two approaches as complementary and necessary components of conservation-oriented restoration. In restoration of a degraded habitat using threatened species (i.e. inter situs), quasi in situ collections can serve an important role in providing long-term preservation of these species' genetic diversity and production of seeds needed for restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.