Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159432›Full record

ReviewNon-coding RNA research2017

LncRNA secondary structure in the cardiovascular system.

Leonie Martens, Frank Rühle, Monika Stoll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Non-coding RNA research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Decoding LncRNAs.Cancers · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Epigenetics and Heart Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Roles and Mechanisms of lncRNAs in Liver Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonie MartensDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Frank RühleDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Monika StollDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been increasingly studied during the past decade. This led to an immense number of annotated transcripts, out of which many were linked to a diverse range of biological mechanisms and diseases. Due to the variety of their regulatory potential, they are seen as an important link in understanding complex epigenetic mechanisms. Prominent examples of lncRNAs in the cardiovascular system are ANRIL, Braveheart, MALAT1 and HOTAIR which have been excessively studied. But despite the impressive number of described transcripts, only a few examples are characterized functionally. One way to do this is to identify accessible structural domains in the RNA secondary structure which have the ability to bind to DNA, RNA or proteins. Through recent improvements in computational as well as experimental methods, this exploration of secondary structure became not only more efficient than traditional methods like crystallization, but also feasible to investigate whole genome RNA structures. The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent advances in secondary structure probing methods and how these can be applied in order to investigate the functional roles of lncRNAs in the cardiovascular system.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular systemLong non-coding RNASecondary structure

Identifiers

PMID30159432
PMCPMC6084829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.