Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159414›Full record

ReviewNon-coding RNA research2016

Role of

Chadrashekar Kagepura Thammaiah, Shankar Jayaram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Non-coding RNA research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of MicroRNAs in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2026
    Article
  7. The YYR (YY1- RKIP) Regulatory Axis in the pathogenesis of Cancer and Immune Evasion.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Non-Coding RNAs in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chadrashekar Kagepura ThammaiahGenogenetics Laboratory, Institution of Excellence, Vijnana Bhavan, University of Mysore, Mysuru, India.
Shankar JayaramP.G. Department of Biotechnology, Teresian College, Mysuru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis and resistance to therapy significantly contribute to cancer-related deaths. Growing body of evidence suggest that altered expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) is one of the root cause of adverse clinical outcome. miRNAs such as

Indexed as

3′ UTRs, 3′ untranslated regionsBC, breast cancerBreast cancerCSC, cancer stem cellIL-6, interleukin-6JAK, Janus protein tyrosine kinaseLet-7MetastasismiRNAmiRNAs, MicroRNAsNF, nuclear factorSNPs, single nucleotide polymorphismsSTAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3Stemness

Identifiers

PMID30159414
PMCPMC6096426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.