Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159257›Full record

ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2017

Predictive value of red blood cell distribution width for mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Azita Ganji, Abbas Esmaeilzadeh, Omid Ghanaei, Amin Saberi, Danial Taherzadeh, Soodabe Sazgarnia, Zohre Mayabi Joghal, Mahboube Zirak, Salman AbdolahRamazani, Leili Zarifmahmoudi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Red cell distribution width is a predictor of all-cause mortality in hospitalized dogs.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Azita GanjiGastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Abbas EsmaeilzadehGastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Omid GhanaeiGastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amin SaberiStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Danial TaherzadehBiochemistry & Nutrition Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Soodabe SazgarniaStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad Azad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Zohre Mayabi JoghalStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad Azad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mahboube ZirakStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Salman AbdolahRamazaniDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Leili ZarifmahmoudiNuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Acute pancreatitisMeta-analysisMortalityPrognosisRed blood cell distribution widthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30159257
PMCPMC6108247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.