ArticleOsong public health and research perspectives2018
The Prevalence of
Article in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroprotective Effect of Artemisinin in an Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Leveraging Mann-Whitney U test on large-scale genetic variation data for analysing malaria genetic markers.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Frequency of CYP2B6 Alleles in Major Iranian Ethnicities, Affecting Response to Efavirenz.Genetics research · 2022Article
- Review
- Frequencies of CYP2B6Genetics research · 2021Article
- Phenotyping Study of Cyclophosphamide 4-Hydroxylation in Malay Cancer Patients.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Article
- CYP2B6 Functional Variability in Drug Metabolism and Exposure Across Populations-Implication for Drug Safety, Dosing, and Individualized Therapy.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- A Review of Danshen Combined with Clopidogrel in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe
methodsA total of 109 healthy subjects were participated in this study.
resultsThere were 96 subjects included in the analysis. In the exon 4 of
conclusionThe prevalence of these
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.