Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159023›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2018

Exploring the potential of civic engagement to strengthen mental health systems in Indonesia (IGNITE): a study protocol.

Helen Brooks, Karen James, I Irmansyah, Budi-Anna Keliat, Bagus Utomo, Diana Rose, Erminia Colucci, Karina Lovell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Helen Brooks *1Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-0200
Karen James *Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston and St Georges, London, UK.
I Irmansyah3National Institute of Health Research and Development, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Budi-Anna Keliat5Faculty of Nursing, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Bagus UtomoKPSI, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Diana Rose7Department of Health Services Research, Kings College London, London, UK.
Erminia Colucci8Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK.
Karina Lovell9Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
King's College - North Carolina · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMiddlesex University · GBMinistry of Health · IDUniversity of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R003386/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndonesia has the highest rate of years of life lost to disability or early death from Schizophrenia than any other country in the world. More than 90% of people with mental illness do not get any treatment and tens of thousands of people with psychosis are illegally detained ('pasung') in the family home. Civic engagement, a core part of the recent World Health Organisation global strategy, has the potential to address some of these challenges through the development of person-centered models of care. The aim of the study is to develop a testable systems level, culturally appropriate, civic engagement framework for use in Jakarta and Bogor, Indonesia to strengthen local mental health services.

methodsA mixed methods study underpinned by a realist approach will be undertaken across four phases in two study sites in Indonesia (Jakarta and Bogor). Phase 1 will explore the use of civic engagement across South East Asia by conducting a systematic review of existing evidence. By surveying 300 mental health professionals, phase 2 will identify the stakeholders, the sources of collaboration and the evidence used by professionals in decision making within local mental health systems and identify potential opportunities for civic engagement within the system. In order to explore the potential use of civic engagement within Indonesian mental health services and identify priorities for a culturally appropriate framework, phase 3 will undertake two focus groups with participants with experience of psychosis or caring for someone with psychosis (n = 20-30). Professionals and other key decision makers in a range of roles across the system at a national (n = 5) and local level (n = 10-15/site) will also take part in semi-structured interviews. Phase 4 will co-produce a civic engagement framework for use in Indonesia by synthesising evidence from phases 1-3 collaboratively with key stakeholders. DISCUSSION: Civic engagement is a potential way in which health services in low and middle income countries can address the burden of mental health conditions through the development of person-centred models of care. However, such approaches are underexplored in Indonesia. This study will work with local stakeholders to design a testable civic engagement framework for use in mental health services in Indonesia.

Indexed as

Civic engagementImplementationIndonesiaLived experienceMental healthRealist methodologyUser involvement

Identifiers

PMID30159023
PMCPMC6109339
OpenAlexW2888613680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.