Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159010›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2018

CANDLE: The critical analysis of the nocturnal distribution of light exposure - A prospective pilot study quantifying the nocturnal light intensity on a critical care unit.

Thomas Craig, Steve Mathieu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. It's All About the CREY!Function (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit: Strategies for Improvement.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas CraigWessex Deanery, Winchester, UK.
Steve MathieuQueen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Queen Alexandra Hospital · GBWest Midlands Deanery · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with critical illness have disrupted circadian rhythms, which can lead to increased morbidity, mortality and length of intensive care unit stay. Light intensity within the intensive care unit influences the circadian rhythm and may therefore impact on patient outcome. We performed an observational single-centre pilot study monitoring nocturnal light exposure of intensive care unit patients between November and December 2016. As there are currently no medical guidance on recommended light levels, we audited our findings against building regulation standards. The median light intensity was 1.5 lux, which is below the 20 lux standards; however, there were significant outliers. There was positive correlation between patient illness severity based on SOFA score and maximum lux (R = 0.45, P = 0.026); however, there was no relationship between patient illness severity and median lux exposure (R = 0.23, P = 0.28). As illness severity increased so did the time spent greater than 20 lux (R = 0.59, P = 0.0021), and the individual occasions where lux breached the 20 lux limit (R = 0.52, P = 0.009). There was no relationship between illness severity of neighbouring patients and maximum lux (R = -0.11, P = 0.69) or neighbouring illness severity and median lux (R = -0.04, P = 0.87). This preliminary work will form the basis of future projects, including national guidance and evaluating the impact of environmental light on patient-centred outcomes.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmCritical caredeliriumenvironmental factorshumanising intensive carelight

Identifiers

PMID30159010
PMCPMC6110023
OpenAlexW2775544677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.