Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30159009›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2018

Exploring fasting practices for critical care patients - A web-based survey of UK intensive care units.

Ella Segaran, Tracy D Lovejoy, Charlie Proctor, Wendy L Bispham, Rebecca Jordan, Bethan Jenkins, Eileen O'Neill, Sarah Ej Harkess, Marius Terblanche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nutritional priorities in patients with severe COVID-19.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ella SegaranNutrition and Dietetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Tracy D LovejoyNutrition and Dietetics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Charlie ProctorDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Northwick Park & St Mark's Hospitals, London, UK.
Wendy L BisphamDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK.
Rebecca JordanDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK.
Bethan JenkinsDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Eileen O'NeillDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Sarah Ej HarkessDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK.
Marius TerblancheDivision of Health and Social Care Research, School of Medicine & Life Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill is frequently interrupted for surgical and airway procedures to avoid aspiration of stomach contents. Recurrent fasting leads to under delivery of enteral nutrition and this underfeeding is associated with worse outcomes. International fasting recommendations do not provide guidance for intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition. This study aimed to gain a detailed perspective of UK critical care fasting practices.

methodsA web-based survey was sent to 232 UK intensive care units consisting of questions relating to fasting practices, presence of guidelines, average fasting times for common procedures and dietitian time per intensive care unit bed.

resultsA total of 176 intensive care units responded. Only 20% of units had guidelines and respondents stated that they were not consistently adhered to (mean compliance 66%). Units with greater dietetic involvement were more likely to have guidelines (p = 0.04). Fasting times were shorter for abdominal surgery (p = 0.002), non-abdominal surgery (p = 0.016) and radiology (p = 0.015) if a guideline was present. Fasting for extubation and tracheostomy was similar irrespective of the presence of a guideline. Considerable variation in fasting times was reported, usually due to inconsistencies in clinical decision-making.

conclusionsThis survey of national practice demonstrates that fasting times are varied and inconsistent, which may lead to under-delivery of enteral nutrition. More dietetic input was associated with increased likelihood of a fasting guideline.

Indexed as

critical careEnteral nutritionfastingguidelinespreoperativesurvey

Identifiers

PMID30159009
PMCPMC6110026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.