Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30158964›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2018

Prognostic Role of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Different BCLC Stages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wan-Fu Lin, Mao-Feng Zhong, Yu-Ren Zhang, Huan Wang, He-Tong Zhao, Bin-Bin Cheng, Chang-Quan Ling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wan-Fu LinDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2483-3392
Mao-Feng ZhongGraduate School of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1938-6882
Yu-Ren ZhangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0527-2526
Huan WangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3145-297X
He-Tong ZhaoDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Bin-Bin ChengDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-130X
Chang-Quan LingDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0037-4059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of PLR on HCC prognosis. Five electronic databases were searched for clinical trials focusing on the role of PLR in the prognosis of HCC. A total of 297 potential studies were initially identified, and 9 studies comprising 2449 patients were finally enrolled to evaluate the association between the pretreatment PLR and clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event occurrence in patients with HCC in different BCLC stages. An elevated pretreatment PLR indicated unfavorable worse OS (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: (1.46, 2.04);

Identifiers

PMID30158964
PMCPMC6109515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.