ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018
Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Most Common Publication Types of Neuroimaging Literature: Papers With High Levels of Evidence Are on the Rise.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Large Language Models May Help Patients Understand Peer-Reviewed Scientific Articles About Ophthalmology: Development and Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Early predictors in language-based learning disabilities: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Psycho-Oncology: A Bibliometric Review of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- An evaluation of rural-urban disparities in treatment outcomes for obstructive sleep apnoea: study protocol for a prospective cohort study.ERJ open research · 2020Article
- Empirical analysis of the text structure of original research articles in medical journals.PloS one · 2020Article
- Pre-service Science Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy: Neuromyths and a Professional Understanding of Learning and Memory.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the Appropriateness and Readability of ChatGPT-4 Responses to Patient Queries on Uveitis.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.