ReviewHealth services insights2018
Measuring Team Effectiveness in the Health Care Setting: An Inventory of Survey Tools.
Review in Health services insights, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Mediating Role of Team Resilience at Work Between Teamwork Practice Environment, Team Functioning and Cohesion in Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Drivers of Hematology and Oncology Care Team Staff Satisfaction.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2025Article
- Development of a Brief, Positively Framed Care Team Experience Measure.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Improving team dynamics in an acute older people care unit to improve quality and safety of care.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Refinement and Validation of the Team Effectiveness Scale for Nursing Units.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Article
- CritCom: assessment of quality of interdisciplinary communication around deterioration in pediatric oncologic patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Communication openness and nosocomial infection reporting: the mediating role of team cohesion.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Finding Primary Care-Repurposing Physician Registration Data to Generate a Regionally Accurate List of Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of an Open-Source Algorithm.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Cancer prevention, risk reduction, and control: opportunities for the next decade of health care delivery research.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Cognitive Diversity as the Quality of Leadership in Crisis: Team Performance in Health Service during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Re-Validation of the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): Assessing the Scale's Utility in Chronic Disease Populations.Health services insights · 2021Article
- Leading Employees Through the Crises: Key Competences of Crises Management in Healthcare Facilities in Coronavirus Pandemic.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- An analysis of movement patterns in mass casualty incident simulations.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2020Article
- Social Network Theory in Interprofessional Education: Revealing Hidden Power.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- Team Functioning And Beliefs About Team Effectiveness In Inter-Professional Teams: Questionnaire Development And Validation.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuidance for measuring team effectiveness in dynamic clinical settings is necessary; however, there are no consensus strategies to help health care organizations achieve optimal teamwork. This systematic review aims to identify validated survey instruments of team effectiveness by clinical settings.
methodsPubMed, MEDLINE, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched for team effectiveness surveys deployed from 1990 to 2016. Validity and reliability were evaluated using 4 psychometric properties: interrater agreement, internal consistency, content validity, and structural integrity. Two conceptual frameworks, the Donabedian model and the Command Team Effectiveness model, assess conceptual dimensions most measured in each health care setting.
resultsThe 22 articles focused on surgical, primary care, and other health care settings. Few instruments report the required psychometric properties or feature non-self-reported outcomes. The major conceptual dimensions measured in the survey instruments differed across settings. Team cohesion and overall perceived team effectiveness can be found in all the team effectiveness measurement tools regardless of the health care setting. We found that surgical settings have distinctive conditions for measuring team effectiveness relative to primary or ambulatory care. DISCUSSION: Further development of setting-specific team effectiveness measurement tools can help further enhance continuous quality improvements and clinical outcomes in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.