ArticleBMJ case reports2018
Breast cancer and organising pneumonia: the importance of correlating the pathological findings with the clinical and radiological picture.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case describes a female patient with a history of breast cancer who presented with a persistent cough and weight loss after a 17-year disease-free period. Radiologically there were new bilateral intrapulmonary nodules and areas of consolidation with a broad differential diagnosis. Brushings gained via bronchoscopy were suggestive of malignancy, but subsequent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery wedge resection demonstrated organising pneumonia (OP) with no evidence of malignancy. Diagnostic uncertainty remained after this, and after a period of observation, there was evidence of disease progression. Further tissue was obtained for cytological and histological assessment which provided conclusive evidence of metastatic breast cancer. In this case, OP was secondary to proximal bronchial obstruction due to metastatic infiltration, of which there are no reported similar cases in the current literature. We discuss the importance of differentiating secondary OP from cryptogenic OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.