Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30158208›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2018

IQOS labelling will mislead consumers.

Karma McKelvey, Lucy Popova, Minji Kim, Lauren Kass Lempert, Benjamin W Chaffee, Maya Vijayaraghavan, Pamela Ling, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Young Adults' Attention to Reduced Exposure Claims in IQOS Advertising and Associations With Product Perceptions and Use Intentions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Decision-Theoretic Public Health Framework for Heated Tobacco and Nicotine Vaping Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. United States Food and Drug Administration's authorization of reduced exposure claims for IQOSRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karma McKelveyDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Lucy PopovaSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Minji KimCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lauren Kass LempertCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Benjamin W ChaffeeCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Maya VijayaraghavanCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Pamela LingCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Bonnie Halpern-FelsherDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Funding

Training and Education p489-500P50CA180890 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLANTZ, STANTON ARNOLD · 2013 to 2018
$20.5M
The Science of Decision Making: Connecting People and PolicyP50DA036128 · NIDA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ERIKSEN, MICHAEL PAUL · 2013 to 2018
$19.4M
Communicating harm of new tobacco productsR00CA187460 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI POPOVA, LYUDMILA · 2016 to 2018
$738k
Novel flavored tobacco products: Adolescent perceptions and behaviorsF32DA044733 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MCKELVEY, KARMA · 2018 to 2019
$129k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180890NCI NIH HHS R00 CA187460NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA044733NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhilip Morris International (PMI) continually expands and diversifies their nicotine product portfolio, which includes IQOS, a heated tobacco product. In December 2016, PMI filed a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) application with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), seeking authorisation to market IQOS in USA with three claims of reduced harm: 'switching completely from conventional cigarettes to the

methodsWe critically reviewed study reports submitted to FDA by PMI in support of proposed marketing claims in its MRTP application for IQOS and focused on the statement that switching completely to IQOS reduces risk.

resultsWe found deficiencies with evidence provided by PMI supporting their assertions that: current smokers will understand what is meant by the phrase 'switching completely'; the proposed claims will not decrease smokers' intentions to quit; and IQOS users will in fact 'switch completely' from smoking cigarettes to using IQOS. The studies and measurement instruments employed by PMI suffer from design flaws and their reporting of associated findings is misleading.

conclusionConsumers will not understand the condition of the claims-that they must quit using cigarettes completely to achieve the inferred health benefits of IQOS. Rather, they are likely to misunderstand the unsupported claims of reduced risks to mean IQOS are harm-free.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorHumansProduct LabelingTobacco Productsadvertising and promotionnon-cigarette tobacco productspackaging and labellingtobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID30158208
PMCPMC6252493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.