Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30158185›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Designing stem cell niches for differentiation and self-renewal.

Hannah Donnelly, Manuel Salmeron-Sanchez, Matthew J Dalby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah DonnellyThe Centre for the Cellular Microenvironment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Manuel Salmeron-SanchezThe Centre for the Cellular Microenvironment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Matthew J DalbyThe Centre for the Cellular Microenvironment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK matthew.dalby@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0528-3359

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N018419/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P00220X/1Medical Research Council MR/L022710/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells, characterized by their ability to differentiate into skeletal tissues and self-renew, hold great promise for both regenerative medicine and novel therapeutic discovery. However, their regenerative capacity is retained only when in contact with their specialized microenvironment, termed the

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell ProliferationStem Cell NicheAnimalsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineTissue Engineeringbiomaterialsdifferentiationmesenchymal stem cellregenerative medicineself-renewalstem cell niche

Identifiers

PMID30158185
PMCPMC6127175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.