Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30158179›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk.

Ludovica Beltrame, Toby Dunne, Hannah Rose Vineer, Josephine G Walker, Eric R Morgan, Peter Vickerman, Catherine M McCann, Diana J L Williams, Thorsten Wagener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Ecohydrology 2.0.Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze fisiche e naturali · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What Modeling Parasites, Transmission, and Resistance Can Teach Us.The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ludovica BeltrameDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ludovica.beltrame@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-3871
Toby DunneDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Hannah Rose VineerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1488-0315
Josephine G WalkerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9732-5738
Eric R MorganCabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-7728
Peter VickermanBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Catherine M McCannEpidemiology Research Unit, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-6031
Diana J L WilliamsInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8186-7236
Thorsten WagenerDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3881-5849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of existing models for predicting disease risk in response to climate change are empirical. These models exploit correlations between historical data, rather than explicitly describing relationships between cause and response variables. Therefore, they are unsuitable for capturing impacts beyond historically observed variability and have limited ability to guide interventions. In this study, we integrate environmental and epidemiological processes into a new mechanistic model, taking the widespread parasitic disease of fasciolosis as an example. The model simulates environmental suitability for disease transmission at a daily time step and 25 m resolution, explicitly linking the parasite life cycle to key weather-water-environment conditions. Using epidemiological data, we show that the model can reproduce observed infection levels in time and space for two case studies in the UK. To overcome data limitations, we propose a calibration approach combining Monte Carlo sampling and expert opinion, which allows constraint of the model in a process-based way, including a quantification of uncertainty. The simulated disease dynamics agree with information from the literature, and comparison with a widely used empirical risk index shows that the new model provides better insight into the time-space patterns of infection, which will be valuable for decision support.

Indexed as

Fasciola hepaticaFascioliasisModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansLiverRisk FactorsUnited Kingdomenvironmental driversfasciolosismechanistic modellingspatio-temporal dynamicswater-based disease

Identifiers

PMID30158179
PMCPMC6127180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.