Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30158141›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2018

Water for African elephants (

Mduduzi Ndlovu, Antón Pérez-Rodríguez, Emma Devereux, Miranda Thomas, Alfredo Colina, Linford Molaba

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating the Presence of Disgust in Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Water for African elephants (Biology letters · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mduduzi NdlovuSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela, South Africa mduduzindlovu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2997-9430
Antón Pérez-RodríguezDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5428-5414
Emma DevereuxSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela, South Africa.
Miranda ThomasGrinnell College, Grinnell, IA, USA.
Alfredo ColinaGrinnell College, Grinnell, IA, USA.
Linford MolabaTechnical Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa.
Grinnell College · USUniversity of the Free State · ZASouth African National Parks · ZAUniversity of Mpumalanga · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In semi-arid protected areas, artificial waterholes ensure that water is locally available to animals for extended periods. However, artificial waterholes may limit animal movement, which contributes towards habitat deterioration. Challenges of artificial water provisioning worsen in the presence of ecosystem engineers like African elephants

Indexed as

Drinking BehaviorWater MicrobiologyAnimalsDroughtsElephantsEscherichia coliFecesSouth AfricaWater QualityWater Supplycamera trapE. colielephant abundanceprotected areaswater quality

Identifiers

PMID30158141
PMCPMC6127117
OpenAlexW2889441870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.