Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157933›Full record

ReviewBMC research notes2018

The manufacturing of human viral challenge agents for use in clinical studies to accelerate the drug development process.

Andrew P Catchpole, Daniel J Fullen, Nicolas Noulin, Alex Mann, Anthony S Gilbert, Rob Lambkin-Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Exploring Risks of Human Challenge Trials For COVID-19.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew P CatchpolehVivo Services Ltd, London, UK. a.catchpole@hvivo.com.
Daniel J FullenhVivo Services Ltd, London, UK.
Nicolas NoulinhVivo Services Ltd, London, UK.
Alex MannhVivo Services Ltd, London, UK.
Anthony S GilberthVivo Services Ltd, London, UK.
Rob Lambkin-WilliamshVivo Services Ltd, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis manuscript aims to provide an overview of the unique considerations and best practice principles associated with the manufacture of human viral challenge agents.

resultsConsiderations are discussed on the entire process from strain and viral source selection through manufacturing, safety and efficacy testing. The human viral challenge (HVC) model is an important tool to help accelerate the drug development process but producing viruses suitable for use in the model presents a unique set of challenges. There are many case by case decisions and risk assessments to consider and no clear international standard to produce viruses for this purpose. The authors present challenge virus manufacturing considerations from the current literature, regulatory guidance and their own direct experience in producing challenge viruses. The use of these viral stocks in clinical studies, as published in peer-reviewed journals, is also briefly described.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryVirusesAntibodies, ViralHumansRisk AssessmentAntibodies, ViralAdventitious agent testingAsthmaClinical trialsExperimental challengeGMPGood manufacturing processHuman rhinovirusHuman viral challenge modelHVCInfluenzaRespiratory syncytial virusViral challenge

Identifiers

PMID30157933
PMCPMC6114718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.