Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157914›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Laboratory evaluations of the 3-month efficacy of oral lotilaner (Credelio™) against experimental infestations of dogs with the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus.

Kim Baker, Claudia Ellenberger, Martin Murphy, Daniela Cavalleri, Wolfgang Seewald, Jason Drake, Steve Nanchen, Kristina Hacket

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protecting dogs and cats against the Australian paralysis tick,Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kim BakerElanco Animal Health, Yarrandoo Research and Development Centre, 245 Western Road, Kemps Creek, NSW 2178, Australia.
Claudia EllenbergerElanco Animal Health, Yarrandoo Research and Development Centre, 245 Western Road, Kemps Creek, NSW 2178, Australia.
Martin MurphyElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniela CavalleriElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Wolfgang SeewaldElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Jason DrakeElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA. drake_jon_j@elanco.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-0852
Steve NanchenElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Kristina HacketElanco Animal Health, Yarrandoo Research and Development Centre, 245 Western Road, Kemps Creek, NSW 2178, Australia.
Elanco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom three days following host attachment, the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus, secretes a neurotoxin that annually causes paralysis in approximately 10,000 domestic pets. Lotilaner, a novel isoxazoline formulated in a chewable flavoured tablet (Credelio

methodsBoth studies included 16 dogs, ranked according to I. holocyclus counts on Day -5 (from infestations on Day -8) and blocked into pairs. One dog in each pair was randomized to be a sham-treated control, the other to receive lotilaner at a minimum dose rate of 20 mg/kg on Day 0. Dogs were dosed in a fed state. Infestations were performed in both studies on Days -8 (to determine the tick carrying capacity of each dog) -1, 28, 56, 70, 77 and 84, and additionally in Study 1 on Day 91, in Study 2 on Days 14 and 42. In Study 1, ticks were counted and assessed as alive or dead at 24, 48 and 72 h post-initial infestation and post-subsequent re-infestations. In study 2, ticks were counted at 24, 48 and 72 h post-dosing or post-re-infestation. Efficacy was determined by the percent reduction in live attached tick counts in the lotilaner group compared to control.

resultsWithin 48 h post-treatment in Study 1 and within 72 h post-treatment in Study 2 all lotilaner-group dogs were free of live ticks. By 72 h post-infestation, efficacy in Study 1 remained at 100% through Day 87, except on Day 31 when a single tick was found on one dog, and through Day 59 in Study 2. Efficacy exceeded 95% through the final assessment in each study (Days 94 and 87 in Studies 1 and 2, respectively).

conclusionThese results demonstrate that lotilaner quickly kills existing I. holocyclus infestations. By providing 95.3-100.0% protection through at least 87 days post-treatment, lotilaner can be a valuable tool in reducing the risk of tick paralysis in dogs.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAustraliaDog DiseasesDogsFemaleInsecticidesIsoxazolesIxodesLaboratoriesMaleNeurotoxinsTabletsTick InfestationsTick ParalysisTime FactorsInsecticidesIsoxazolesNeurotoxinsTabletsCredelioDogIxodes holocyclusLotilanerParalysis tick

Identifiers

PMID30157914
PMCPMC6116354
OpenAlexW2889101320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.