Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157908›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Spatio-temporal spillover risk of yellow fever in Brazil.

RajReni B Kaul, Michelle V Evans, Courtney C Murdock, John M Drake

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Re-emergence of yellow fever in the neotropics - quo vadis?Emerging topics in life sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Confronting models with data: the challenges of estimating disease spillover.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Mosquito and primate ecology predict human risk of yellow fever virus spillover in Brazil.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

RajReni B KaulCenter for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. reni@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4820-5972
Michelle V EvansCenter for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Courtney C MurdockCenter for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
John M DrakeCenter for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYellow fever virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that persists in an enzoonotic cycle in non-human primates (NHPs) in Brazil, causing disease in humans through spillover events. Yellow fever (YF) re-emerged in the early 2000s, spreading from the Amazon River basin towards the previously considered low-risk, southeastern region of the country. Previous methods mapping YF spillover risk do not incorporate the temporal dynamics and ecological context of the disease, and are therefore unable to predict seasonality in spatial risk across Brazil. We present the results of a bagged logistic regression predicting the propensity for YF spillover per municipality (administrative sub-district) in Brazil from environmental and demographic covariates aggregated by month. Ecological context was incorporated by creating National and Regional models of spillover dynamics, where the Regional model consisted of two separate models determined by the regions' NHP reservoir species richness (high vs low).

resultsOf the 5560 municipalities, 82 reported YF cases from 2001 to 2013. Model accuracy was high for the National and low reservoir richness (LRR) models (AUC = 0.80), while the high reservoir richness (HRR) model accuracy was lower (AUC = 0.63). The National model predicted consistently high spillover risk in the Amazon, while the Regional model predicted strong seasonality in spillover risk. Within the Regional model, seasonality of spillover risk in the HRR region was asynchronous to the LRR region. However, the observed seasonality of spillover risk in the LRR Regional model mirrored the national model predictions.

conclusionsThe predicted risk of YF spillover varies with space and time. Seasonal trends differ between regions indicating, at times, spillover risk can be higher in the urban coastal regions than the Amazon River basin which is counterintuitive based on current YF risk maps. Understanding the spatio-temporal patterns of YF spillover risk could better inform allocation of public health services.

Indexed as

Ecological and Environmental PhenomenaAedesAnimalsBrazilDisease OutbreaksDisease ReservoirsHumansLogistic ModelsMosquito VectorsPrimatesRiskSeasonsSpatio-Temporal AnalysisYellow FeverYellow fever virusArbovirusesBrazilRisk mappingSpatial epidemiologyVectorsYellow fever

Identifiers

PMID30157908
PMCPMC6116573
OpenAlexW2889539534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.