ReviewGlobalization and health2018
Are health systems interventions gender blind? examining health system reconstruction in conflict affected states.
Review in Globalization and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of sex and gender differences in treatment outcome of inflammatory skin diseases: Is it time for new guidelines?Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Pooled it
- The Use of Intersectional Analysis in Assessing Women's Leadership Progress in the Health Workforce in LMICs: A Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Pooled it
- The evidence gap on gendered impacts of performance-based financing among family physicians for chronic disease care: a systematic review reanalysis in contexts of single-payer universal coverage.Human resources for health · 2020Pooled it
- Strengthening Primary Health Care for Improved Population Health and Health Equity in Somalia: A Narrative Review.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Strengthening women's leadership in health systems through innovation and intersectionality.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Intersectional experiences of non-communicable diseases and health seeking strategies in informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Review
- Unshackling our youth from the chains of substance abuse as disaster risk.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Prioritization of maternal and newborn health policies and their implementation in the eastern conflict affected areas of the Democratic Republic of Congo: a political economy analysis.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Strengthening health systems and peacebuilding through women's leadership: a qualitative study.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- Gender in public health research: Reflections on design and process across four research projects in low-and middle-income countries.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Gender composition and wage gaps in the Canadian health policy research workforce in comparative perspective.Human resources for health · 2022Observational
- A missing piece in the Health for Peace agenda: gender diverse leadership and governance.BMJ global health · 2022Review
- Supporting community health workers in fragile settings from a gender perspective: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Factors Affecting Quality of Care in Maternal and Child Health in Timor-Leste: A Scoping Review.Health services insights · 2022Article
- Community health workers: challenges and vulnerabilities of Accredited Social Health Activists working in conflict-affected settings in the state of Assam, India.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Participation of women in the health workforce in the fragile and conflict-affected countries: a scoping review.Human resources for health · 2021Article
- Exploring the role of gender and women in the political economy of health in armed conflict: a narrative review.Globalization and health · 2021Review
- Towards an Explanation of the Social Value of Health Systems: An Interpretive Synthesis.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal health policy prioritizes improving the health of women and girls, as evident in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), multiple women's health initiatives, and the billions of dollars spent by international donors and national governments to improve health service delivery in low-income countries. Countries recovering from fragility and conflict often engage in wide-ranging institutional reforms, including within the health system, to address inequities. Research and policy do not sufficiently explore how health system interventions contribute to the broader goal of gender equity.
methodsThis paper utilizes a framework synthesis approach to examine if and how rebuilding health systems affected gender equity in the post-conflict contexts of Mozambique, Timor Leste, Sierra Leone, and Northern Uganda. To undertake this analysis, we utilized the WHO health systems building blocks to establish benchmarks of gender equity. We then identified and evaluated a broad range of available evidence on these building blocks within these four contexts. We reviewed the evidence to assess if and how health interventions during the post-conflict reconstruction period met these gender equity benchmarks.
findingsOur analysis shows that the four countries did not meet gender equitable benchmarks in their health systems. Across all four contexts, health interventions did not adequately reflect on how gender norms are replicated by the health system, and conversely, how the health system can transform these gender norms and promote gender equity. Gender inequity undermined the ability of health systems to effectively improve health outcomes for women and girls. From our findings, we suggest the key attributes of gender equitable health systems to guide further research and policy.
conclusionThe use of gender equitable benchmarks provides important insights into how health system interventions in the post-conflict period neglected the role of the health system in addressing or perpetuating gender inequities. Given the frequent contact made by individuals with health services, and the important role of the health system within societies, this gender blind nature of health system engagement missed an important opportunity to contribute to more equitable and peaceful societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.