Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157881›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

Sexual health of very young adolescents in South Western Uganda: a cross-sectional assessment of sexual knowledge and behavior.

Elizabeth Kemigisha, Katharine Bruce, Viola N Nyakato, Gad Ndaruhutse Ruzaaza, Anna B Ninsiima, Wendo Mlahagwa, Els Leye, Gily Coene, Kristien Michielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth KemigishaMbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda. ekemigisha@must.ac.ug.
Katharine BruceMbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Viola N NyakatoMbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Gad Ndaruhutse RuzaazaMbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Anna B NinsiimaRHEA, Centre of Expertise on Gender, Diversity and Intersectionality, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Wendo MlahagwaMbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Els LeyeInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Gily CoeneRHEA, Centre of Expertise on Gender, Diversity and Intersectionality, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Kristien MichielsenInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

VLIR-UOS ZEIN2015PR411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most Sub-Saharan African countries, little is known about young adolescents' sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Though some efforts have been made to understand and improve SRH of older adolescents, very young adolescents (VYAs) are often overlooked, and little is known about their sexual knowledge and behaviors. The goal of this study was to describe SRH knowledge, information-seeking, and sexual behavior of VYAs in Uganda.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was administered in 33 primary schools in June and July of 2016. Trained interviewers administered surveys to adolescents ages 10-14 regarding SRH knowledge, information-seeking, sexual behavior, and relevant covariates. Continuous variables were summarized as means (SD) or medians (IQR) whereas categorical variables were summarized as proportions (percentages).

resultsA total of 1096 adolescents were included in this analysis, 81.8% of which were from rural areas, with a median age of 12. Regarding sexually transmitted infections (STIs) knowledge; 95% knew HIV while 37% knew other STIs apart from HIV. Although 47% knew at least one way in which HIV is acquired only 8% knew at least four ways. Regarding contraceptive knowledge, 56% mentioned at least one modern method of preventing pregnancy (condoms, pills, intrauterine devices, implants, or injections). The majority (85%) of VYAs reported accessing SRH information in the media with 35% reporting accessing media with sexual content while 10% vs 22% consulted their father or mother respectively and 31% a school source. At least 7.6% of VYAs had ever had sexual intercourse, 90% of which were not using any protection.

conclusionComprehensive SRH knowledge was low among VYAs in this study. Media remains an important source of information for SRH for this age group though it may be misused as some adolescents reported accessing sexual content that may be inappropriate. A large proportion of sexually active VYAs reported sexual risky behaviors. This study highlights the need for an accurate and more comprehensive SRH education approach for VYAs in Uganda at an opportune age before the majority engage in sexual behavior.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSexual BehaviorSexual HealthAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePregnancyUgandaSexualityUgandaYoung adolescents

Identifiers

PMID30157881
PMCPMC6114035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.