Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157841›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2018

Assessment of a rtPCR for the detection of virulent and benign Dichelobacter nodosus, the causative agent of ovine footrot, in Australia.

Nickala Best, Lucas Zanandrez, Jacek Gwozdz, Eckard Klien, Nicky Buller, Robert Suter, Grant Rawlin, Travis Beddoe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Serological Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  2. Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nickala BestDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Centre for AgriBioscience (AgriBio), La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lucas ZanandrezFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Jacek GwozdzDepartment of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Centre for AgriBioscience (AgriBio), Victorian Government, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Eckard KlienDAFWA Diagnostics and Laboratory Services, Biosecurity and Regulation, Department of Agriculture and Food, South Perth, Western Australia.
Nicky BullerDAFWA Diagnostics and Laboratory Services, Biosecurity and Regulation, Department of Agriculture and Food, South Perth, Western Australia.
Robert SuterAgriculture Services and Biosecurity Operations, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Attwood, Victoria, Australia.
Grant RawlinDepartment of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Centre for AgriBioscience (AgriBio), Victorian Government, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Travis BeddoeDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Centre for AgriBioscience (AgriBio), La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. t.beddoe@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-2277
Government of Victoria · AULa Trobe University · AUUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvine footrot is a highly contagious bacterial disease of sheep, costing the Australian sheep industry millions of dollars annually. Dichelobacter nodosus, the causative agent of footrot, is a gram-negative anaerobe classed into virulent and benign strains as determined by thermostability of their respective protesases. Current methods for detection of D. nodosus are difficult and time-consuming, however new molecular techniques capable of rapidly detecting and typing D. nodosus have been reported.

resultsA competitive real-time PCR (rtPCR) method, based on the ability to detect a 2 nucleotide difference in the aprV2 (virulent) and aprB2 (benign) extracellular protease gene has been tested on Australian samples for determining detection rates, along with clinically relevant cut-off values and performance in comparison to the traditional culturing methods. The rtPCR assay was found to have a specificity of 98.3% for virulent and 98.7% for benign detection from samples collected. Sheep with clinical signs of footrot showed a detection rate for virulent strains of 81.1% and for benign strains of 18.9%. A cut-off value of a Ct of 35 was found to be the most appropriate for use in Victoria for detection of sheep carrying virulent D. nodosus.

conclusionsIn summary, the rtPCR assay is significantly more capable of detecting D. nodosus than culturing, while there is no significant difference seen in virotyping between the two methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsAustraliaDichelobacter nodosusFoot RotGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSheepSheep DiseasesVirulenceAustraliaBenignFootrotReal-time polymerase chain reactionSensitivitySheepSpecificityVictoriaVirulent

Identifiers

PMID30157841
PMCPMC6114850
OpenAlexW2888973497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.