Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157827›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Self-diagnosed depression in the Norwegian general population - associations with neuroticism, extraversion, optimism, and general self-efficacy.

Tore Bonsaksen, Tine K Grimholt, Laila Skogstad, Anners Lerdal, Øivind Ekeberg, Trond Heir, Inger Schou-Bredal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact ofNutrients · 2025
    Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Family Dysfunction and Cyberchondria among Chinese Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tore BonsaksenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway. tore.bonsaksen@oslomet.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-1111
Tine K GrimholtDepartment of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Laila SkogstadDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Anners LerdalDepartment for Patient Safety and Research, Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Øivind EkebergDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Trond HeirNorwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Inger Schou-BredalInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulti-item rating scales for depression informs about the level of depression, but does not allow individuals to state by self-evaluation whether they feel depressed or not. The insider perspective on depression is rarely assessed. This study investigated the prevalence of self-diagnosed depression in the Norwegian general population, and associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors.

methodsAs part of a national survey, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Life Orientation Test-Revised, a short version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and a one-item measure of self-diagnosed depression was administered to 5.500 persons in the general Norwegian population. Of the 4961 eligible participants ≥ 18 years of age, 1.787 (response rate 36%) participated in the survey, and 1.684 of these had valid scores on the relevant scales. The associations between sociodemographic factors and self-diagnosed depression were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

resultsOne hundred and thirty-six participants (8.1%) reported depression during the preceding month. When adjusting for sociodemographic and psychological variables, higher age (OR = 0.82), being in work (OR = 0.57), and higher levels of general self-efficacy (OR = 0.67) and optimism (OR = 0.52) were associated with lower risk of self-diagnosed depression, whereas higher levels of neuroticism (OR = 1.97) was associated with higher risk.

conclusionsThe prevalence of self-diagnosed depression in the adult Norwegian population was higher for women than for men. Higher age, being in work and having higher levels of psychological resources appear to reduce the risk of self-diagnosed depression, whereas neuroticism increases the risk.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionExtraversion, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroticismNorwayOptimismPrevalenceRisk FactorsExtraversionGenderGeneral self-efficacyLife orientation testNeuroticismOptimismPersonalityPopulation studySelf-reportSurvey

Identifiers

PMID30157827
PMCPMC6116443
OpenAlexW2888828655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.