ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2018
Access and Disclosure of Personal Health Information: A Challenging Privacy Landscape in 2016-2018.
Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Findings from 2017 on Health Information ManagementYearbook of medical informatics · 2018Pooled it
- Access to historic individually identifiable health information: a multi-institutional survey of research institutions.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- Legal protection of personal health information in medical AI applications in China: challenges and regulatory responses.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cross-jurisdictional Data Transfer in Health Research: Stakeholder Perceptions on the Role of Law.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- Does the disclosure of medical insurance information affect patients' willingness to adopt the diagnosis related groups system.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Theoretical Approach and Scale Construction of Patient Privacy Protection Behavior of Doctors in Public Medical Institutions in China: Pilot Development Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- How do people think about the implementation of speech and video recognition technology in emergency medical practice?PloS one · 2022Article
- Strengthen Electronic Health Records System (EHR-S) Access-Control to Cope with GDPR Explicit Consent.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the current health data access and disclosure environment for potential privacy-protecting mechanisms that enable legitimate use of personal health information while preserving the rights of individuals. To identify the gaps and challenges between increasing requests and expanding uses of such information and the regulations, technologies, and management practices that permit appropriate access and disclosure while guarding against harmful misuse of such information.
methodsA scoping literature review focused on (1) regulations affecting access and disclosure of personal health information, (2) the uses of health information that challenge access and disclosure boundaries, and (3) privacy management practices that may help mitigate gaps in protecting patient privacy.
resultsCountries and jurisdictions are developing laws, regulations, and public policies to balance the privacy rights of individuals and the unprecedented opportunities to advance health and health care through expanded uses of health data. Regulations and guidance are evolving, but they are outpaced by the increasing demand for and the challenges of managing access and disclosure. Mechanisms such as consent and authorization may not always be adequate. Mechanisms that advance principled stewardship are more important than ever.
conclusionsAccess and disclosure management are important dimensions of privacy management practices. This is a volatile period in which diverging public policies may reveal how best to balance access and disclosure of personal health information by individuals and by institutional custodians of the information. Approaches to access and disclosure management, including the roles of individuals, should be a focus for research and study in the years ahead.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.