Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157499›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2018

SNOMED CT Concept Hierarchies for Sharing Definitions of Clinical Conditions Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Duwayne L Willett, Vaishnavi Kannan, Ling Chu, Joel R Buchanan, Ferdinand T Velasco, John D Clark, Jason S Fish, Adolfo R Ortuzar, Josh E Youngblood, Deepa G Bhat and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Leveraging SNOMED CT for patient cohort identification over heterogeneous EHR data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  4. Quantitatively assessing the impact of the quality of SNOMED CT subtype hierarchy on cohort queries.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  5. Validation of an acute respiratory infection phenotyping algorithm to support robust computerised medical record-based respiratory sentinel surveillance, England, 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emergency department initiation of pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder: A retrospective cohort study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating the representation of disaster hazards in SNOMED CT: gaps and opportunities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Translating and evaluating historic phenotyping algorithms using SNOMED CT.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Validation of the WATCH-DM and TRS-HFJournal of the American Heart Association · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Decision Support Systems.Visceral medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Duwayne L WillettDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Vaishnavi KannanHealth System Information Resources Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Ling ChuDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Joel R BuchananDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Ferdinand T VelascoTexas Health Resources, Arlington, Texas, United States.
John D ClarkDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Jason S FishDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Adolfo R OrtuzarHealth System Information Resources Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Josh E YoungbloodHealth System Information Resources Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Deepa G BhatSouthwestern Health Resources, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Mujeeb A BasitDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefining clinical conditions from electronic health record (EHR) data underpins population health activities, clinical decision support, and analytics. In an EHR, defining a condition commonly employs a diagnosis value set or "grouper." For constructing value sets, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) offers high clinical fidelity, a hierarchical ontology, and wide implementation in EHRs as the standard interoperability vocabulary for problems.

objectiveThis article demonstrates a practical approach to defining conditions with combinations of SNOMED CT concept hierarchies, and evaluates sharing of definitions for clinical and analytic uses.

methodsWe constructed diagnosis value sets for EHR patient registries using SNOMED CT concept hierarchies combined with Boolean logic, and shared them for clinical decision support, reporting, and analytic purposes.

resultsA total of 125 condition-defining "standard" SNOMED CT diagnosis value sets were created within our EHR. The median number of SNOMED CT concept hierarchies needed was only 2 (25th-75th percentiles: 1-5). Each value set, when compiled as an EHR diagnosis grouper, was associated with a median of 22 International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes (25th-75th percentiles: 8-85) and yielded a median of 155 clinical terms available for selection by clinicians in the EHR (25th-75th percentiles: 63-976). Sharing of standard groupers for population health, clinical decision support, and analytic uses was high, including 57 patient registries (with 362 uses of standard groupers), 132 clinical decision support records, 190 rules, 124 EHR reports, 125 diagnosis dimension slicers for self-service analytics, and 111 clinical quality measure calculations. Identical SNOMED CT definitions were created in an EHR-agnostic tool enabling application across disparate organizations and EHRs.

conclusionSNOMED CT-based diagnosis value sets are simple to develop, concise, understandable to clinicians, useful in the EHR and for analytics, and shareable. Developing curated SNOMED CT hierarchy-based condition definitions for public use could accelerate cross-organizational population health efforts, "smarter" EHR feature configuration, and clinical-translational research employing EHR-derived data.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansSoftwareTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID30157499
PMCPMC6115233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.