Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157243›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A novel panel of short mononucleotide repeats linked to informative polymorphisms enabling effective high volume low cost discrimination between mismatch repair deficient and proficient tumours.

Lisa Redford, Ghanim Alhilal, Stephanie Needham, Ottie O'Brien, Julie Coaker, John Tyson, Leonardo Maldaner Amorim, Iona Middleton, Osagi Izuogu, Mark Arends and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An unusual phenotype occurs in 15% of mismatch repair-deficient tumors and is associated with non-colorectal cancers and genetic syndromes.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  9. Assessment of Microsatellite Instability from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Lisa RedfordInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Ghanim AlhilalInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Stephanie NeedhamPathology Department and Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Ottie O'BrienPathology Department and Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Julie CoakerQuantuMDx group ltd, Lugano Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
John TysonQuantuMDx group ltd, Lugano Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Leonardo Maldaner AmorimLaboratório de Genética Molecular Humana, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, CEP, Brazil.
Iona MiddletonInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Osagi IzuoguInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Mark ArendsWestern General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Anca OniscuWestern General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ángel Miguel AlonsoServicio de Genética Médica, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Hospital Virgen del Camino, C/ Irunlarrea 4, Pamplona, Spain.
Sira Moreno LagunaServicio de Genética Médica, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Hospital Virgen del Camino, C/ Irunlarrea 4, Pamplona, Spain.
Richard GallonInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Harsh ShethInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9626-0971
Mauro Santibanez-KorefInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Michael S JacksonInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
John BurnInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic mutations in mononucleotide repeats are commonly used to assess the mismatch repair status of tumours. Current tests focus on repeats with a length above 15bp, which tend to be somatically more unstable than shorter ones. These longer repeats also have a substantially higher PCR error rate, and tests that use capillary electrophoresis for fragment size analysis often require expert interpretation. In this communication, we present a panel of 17 short repeats (length 7-12bp) for sequence-based microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. Using a simple scoring procedure that incorporates the allelic distribution of the mutant repeats, and analysis of two cohort of tumours totalling 209 samples, we show that this panel is able to discriminate between MMR proficient and deficient tumours, even when constitutional DNA is not available. In the training cohort, the method achieved 100% concordance with fragment analysis, while in the testing cohort, 4 discordant samples were observed (corresponding to 97% concordance). Of these, 2 showed discrepancies between fragment analysis and immunohistochemistry and one was reclassified after re-testing using fragment analysis. These results indicate that our approach offers the option of a reliable, scalable routine test for MSI.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFixativesFormaldehydeGene FrequencyHumansParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationBiomarkers, TumorFixativesFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID30157243
PMCPMC6114912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.