Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157212›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Changes in spontaneous movement in response to silent gaps are not robust enough to indicate the perception of tinnitus in mice.

Daniël O J Reijntjes, Nick M A Schubert, Alexander Pietrus-Rajman, Pim van Dijk, Sonja J Pyott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniël O J ReijntjesUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head/Neck surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nick M A SchubertUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head/Neck surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Alexander Pietrus-RajmanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head/Neck surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pim van DijkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head/Neck surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sonja J PyottUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head/Neck surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-2707
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approaches to identify the perception of tinnitus in various animal models have been difficult to apply to mouse. As a result, mice have been underutilized to investigate the cellular, molecular, and genetic mechanisms underlying tinnitus. A recent study in guinea pigs identified a novel spontaneous behavior (unconditioned response), changes in movement during silent gaps, that identified a subgroup of animals presumably with tinnitus. Guinea pigs identified with tinnitus failed to "freeze" in response to silent gaps in sound. In the hope of developing a rapid and reliable assay for mice, we used a similar approach. C57BL/6J mice underwent three trials in which spontaneous movement was video recorded in the presence of white noise interrupted with six silent gaps. Movement metrics included velocity and body movement. Before the third trial, mice underwent either sham or noise exposure to induce hearing loss and tinnitus. Auditory brainstem responses before and after noise trauma confirmed normal hearing in sham-treated animals and hearing loss in the noise-exposed cohort. No differences in the various movement metrics were detected during the silent gaps either before or after sham/noise exposure. Variability in spontaneous movement both before and after sham/noise exposure was substantially greater in mice compared to guinea pigs. Thus, this assay is not sufficiently statistically powerful to identify changes in movement that might indicate tinnitus perception in mice. Previous observations also reported increased movement overall in guinea pigs identified as suffering tinnitus. In contrast, mice showed no statistically significant differences in movement between the three trials. Despite our results, other unconditioned (as well as conditioned) behaviors should be examined in mice to test their utility to detect changes that indicate the perception of tinnitus. Such assays are essential to accelerate the use of mouse models in tinnitus research.

Indexed as

MovementNoisePerceptionAnimalsBrain StemHearing LossMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID30157212
PMCPMC6114799
OpenAlexW2888930614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.