Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157206›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Oxygen therapy in patients with retinal artery occlusion: A meta-analysis.

Xiaodong Wu, Shuangshuang Chen, Shizun Li, Ji Zhang, Di Luan, Shoucai Zhao, Zhaohu Chu, Yang Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Atrial fibrillation in Retinal Artery Occlusions.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Early prostaglandin EFrontiers in ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaodong WuDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Shuangshuang ChenDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Shizun LiDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Ji ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Di LuanDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Shoucai ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Zhaohu ChuDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Yang XuDepartment of Neurology, Wannan Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8778-3885
First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxygen therapy has been widely used for RAO (retinal artery occlusion) patients; however, inconsistent results have been reported.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline (OvidSP), Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database were examined. The primary endpoint was visual acuity (VA), and RevMan software 5.3 was used to statistically analyze the outcomes.

resultsSeven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. Patients who received oxygen therapy exhibited probability of visual improvement about 5.61 times compared with the control group who did not receive oxygen therapy (OR = 5.61; 95% CI, 3.60-8.73; p < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was observed between oxygen inhalation methods (Chi2 = 0.18, df = 1, p = 0.67), combined therapy (Chi2 = 0.21, df = 1, p = 0.64), or RAO type (Chi2 = 0.06, df = 1, p = 0.81). Conversely, 100% oxygen (Chi2 = 4.55, df = 1, p < 0.05) and hyperbaric oxygen (Chi2 = 4.55, df = 1, p < 0.05) significantly improved VA in RAO patients. Better effect was showed in period within 3 months (Chi2 = 5.76, df = 1, p < 0.05). The most effective treatment length was over 9 hours (Chi2 = 6.58, df = 1, p < 0.05).

conclusionOxygen therapy demonstrated beneficial effects in improving VA in RAO patients, particularly when patients were treated with 100% hyperbaric oxygen and for over 9 hours.

Indexed as

Hyperbaric OxygenationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetinal Artery Occlusion

Identifiers

PMID30157206
PMCPMC6114710
OpenAlexW2889439331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.