Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30157188›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Phenotypic screening and molecular characterization of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli recovered from febrile neutropenic pediatric cancer patients in Egypt.

Noha A Kamel, Wafaa N El-Tayeb, Mona R El-Ansary, Mohamed T Mansour, Khaled M Aboshanab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantNorthern clinics of Istanbul · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Whole-genome sequencing of Egyptian multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: a multi-center pilot study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multidrug-Resistant and Carbapenemase-ProducingBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noha A KamelDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt.
Wafaa N El-TayebDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt.
Mona R El-AnsaryDepartment of Biochemistry, Modern University for Technology and Information, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed T MansourDepartment of Virology and Immunology, 57357 Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Khaled M AboshanabDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-850X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimInfections with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are among the most frequent complications in the immunocompromised cancer patients because of their considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to characterize the prevalence of carbapenemase-producing GNB recovered from febrile neutropenic pediatric cancer patients in Egypt.

methodsStandard methods were used for identification, sensitivity testing (Kirby-Bauer and broth microdilution method according to CLSI guidelines). Standard methods were applied for both phenotypic and genotypic detection of the carbapenemase-producing GNB.

resultsA total of 185 GNB were recovered from different clinical specimens, Escherichia (E.) coli (86; 46.48%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (71; 38.37%), Acinetobacter (A.) baumannii (7; 3.78%) and others including Pseudomonas spp., Enterobacter (Ent.) cloacae and Proteus spp. (21; 11.35%). It is a matter of concern that 116 out of 171 enterobacterial isolates (94.15%) showed resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes and were considered multidrug resistant. Additionally, the rate of carbapenem-resistance displayed a worrisome trend as 113 out of 171 enterobacterial isolates (66.08%) and 12 out of 14 non fermenting bacilli (85.71%) showed resistance pattern to at least one of the tested carbapenems. After performing a series of phenotypic tests for initial screening of potential carbapenemase producers, molecular characterization to the 29 extracted plasmids were subjected to PCR (using 5 common carbapenemase primers). The results revealed that blaOXA-48 was the most prevalent 17 (58.62%), followed by blaNDM 8(27.58%), then blaVIM 3 (10.3%) and blaKPC 2 (6.89%).

conclusionThese results are an alarming threat to public health that calls for urgent application of antimicrobial stewardship programs along with routine surveillance for controlling outbreaks.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial Typing Techniquesbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaChildGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMicrobiotaPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID30157188
PMCPMC6114715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.