Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30156607›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2018

Gender-Based Differences in Anxiety and Depression Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Pranas Serpytis, Petras Navickas, Laura Lukaviciute, Alvydas Navickas, Ramunas Aranauskas, Rokas Serpytis, Ausra Deksnyte, Sigita Glaveckaite, Zaneta Petrulioniene, Robertas Samalavicius

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Psychological Factors and Metacognitive Beliefs in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Single-Group Pre-Post Study.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Scoping Review on Biopsychosocial Predictors of Mental Health among Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pranas SerpytisVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Petras NavickasVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Laura LukaviciuteVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Alvydas NavickasVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Ramunas AranauskasVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Rokas SerpytisVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Ausra DeksnyteVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Sigita GlaveckaiteVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Zaneta PetrulionieneVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Robertas SamalaviciusVilnius University - Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius - Lithuania.
Vilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong patients with heart disease, depression and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and persistent. Both depression and anxiety play a significant role in cardiovascular disease progression and are acknowledged to be independent risk factors. However, there is very little gender-related analysis concerning cardiovascular diseases and emotional disorders.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate depression and anxiety levels in patients suffering from myocardial infarction [MI] within the first month after the MI and to assess the association between cardiovascular disease risk factors, demographic indicators and emotional disorders, as well as to determine whether there are gender-based differences or similarities.

methodsThis survey included demographic questions, clinical characteristics, questions about cardiovascular disease risk factors and the use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsIt was determined that 71.4% of female and 60.4% of male patients had concomitant anxiety and/or depression symptomatology (p = 0.006). Using men as the reference point, women had an elevated risk of having some type of psychiatric disorder (odds ratio, 2.86, p = 0.007). The HADS-D score was notably higher in women (8.66 ± 3.717) than men (6.87 ± 4.531, p = 0.004). It was determined that male patients who developed depression were on average younger than those without depression (p = 0.005).

conclusionsWomen demonstrated an elevated risk of having anxiety and/or depression disorder compared to men. Furthermore, depression severity increased with age in men, while anxiety severity decreased. In contrast, depression and anxiety severity was similar for women of all ages after the MI. A higher depression score was associated with diabetes and physical inactivity, whereas a higher anxiety score was associated with smoking in men. Hypercholesterolemia was associated with both higher anxiety and depression scores, and a higher depression score was associated with physical inactivity in women.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionDepressive DisorderDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansHypercholesterolemiaMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Infarction

Identifiers

PMID30156607
PMCPMC6248233
OpenAlexW2886781574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.