Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30156456›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

What Patients Know About Services to Help Manage Chronic Diseases and Medications: Findings from Focus Groups on Medication Therapy Management.

Ann M Taylor, David Rhys Axon, Patrick Campbell, Miranda K Fair, Melissa Nelson, Kevin Boesen, Rose Martin, Terri L Warholak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Predictors of Receipt of Comprehensive Medication Reviews in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Student Pharmacists' Perceptions of Amazon Pharmacy.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Medication Therapy Management: Current Challenges.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2020
    Review
  12. Online Provision of Part D Medication Therapy Management Program Information.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann M Taylor1 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
David Rhys Axon1 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Patrick Campbell1 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Miranda K Fair1 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Melissa Nelson1 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Kevin Boesen3 SinfonîaRx, Tucson, Arizona.
Rose Martin2 Medication Management Center, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Terri L Warholak1 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManaging and treating patients with multiple chronic conditions presents challenges on many levels. Pharmacist-delivered medication therapy management (MTM) services, mandated as part of the Medicare Part D drug benefit, are designed to help patients manage their chronic conditions and medications.

objectiveTo identify factors that influence patient understanding and use of MTM services and potential strategies to educate individuals about MTM.

methodsParticipants who had at least 2 chronic conditions, were taking 2 or more prescription medications, and were aged 18 years or older were recruited from community-based settings to participate in focus groups. The focus groups aimed to identify participants' perceptions and use of MTM services, barriers and facilitators to utilization, and medication problems. Participants were asked to complete a 14-item health care questionnaire and view a brief, 3-minute video introducing the topic of MTM before the group discussion. The health care questionnaire data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel. The focus group responses were transcribed and entered into the computer program ATLAS.ti for thematic analysis. Two independent reviewers qualitatively coded the discussion question responses; a third reviewer investigated discrepancies and facilitated consensus among the reviewers.

resultsParticipants (N = 27) were mostly female (70.4%), college educated (62.9%), and had Medicare insurance (81.5%). Seven themes were identified: (1) new proposed names for MTM, (2) mechanisms to gain interest in and to promote the value of MTM, (3) familiarity with MTM, (4) pharmacists' training and expertise in MTM, (5) experience with MTM, (6) reasons for nonparticipation in MTM, and (7) preferred method to learn about MTM. Participants did not understand the term "medication therapy management" and felt the interpretation of "therapy"' differed between health care professionals and the public. Some participants used MTM services to learn about appropriate use of their medications, while others were unsure about their eligibility, associated costs, and how to access the services. Participants had limited pharmaceutical knowledge but felt pharmacist-provided MTM services were helpful. Participants were unfamiliar with pharmacists' skills and training. Participants' experiences with MTM services ranged from disregarding the invitation to participate to having pharmacists identify drug-drug interactions. Reasons for nonparticipation in MTM services included being unaware of their eligibility, failing to read excessive information from insurance companies, and being uncertain of the identity of the telephone caller. Preferred methods for learning more about MTM services included the Internet, e-mail, information availability at physician's office, and television advertisements.

conclusionsThese results suggest that the lay public remains largely unaware of MTM services and that the term "MTM" is not well understood. Clearly, tailored public health campaigns and patient engagement strategies are needed to promote MTM in chronic disease management, pharmacists as respected providers, and the importance of the prescriber-MTM pharmacist collaborative relationship in managing medications for patients with multiple chronic conditions. DISCLOSURES: Grant funding from SinfoniaRx to Taylor, Axon, Campbell, Fair, and Warholak was used to help conduct this project. Boesen is employed by SinfoniaRx. The other authors have nothing to disclose. This original research was presented as a poster at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 27th Annual Meeting and Expo; April 7-10, 2015; San Diego, CA.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMedicare Part DMedication Therapy ManagementPatient ParticipationPrescription DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID30156456
PMCPMC10398267
OpenAlexW2889437724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.