Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30156183›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

A citizen perspective on nutritional warnings as front-of-pack labels: insights for the design of accompanying policy measures.

Gastón Ares, Jessica Aschemann-Witzel, María Rosa Curutchet, Lucía Antúnez, Ximena Moratorio, Isabel Bove

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gastón Ares1Sensometrics & Consumer Science,Instituto Polo Tecnológico de Pando,Facultad de Química,Universidad de la República,By Pass de Rutas 8 y 101 s/n,CP 91000,Pando,Canelones,Uruguay.
Jessica Aschemann-Witzel2MAPP Centre for Research on Customer Relations in the Food Sector,Aarhus University,Aarhus,Denmark.
María Rosa Curutchet3Observatorio de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutricional,Instituto Nacional de Alimentación,Montevideo,Uruguay.
Lucía Antúnez1Sensometrics & Consumer Science,Instituto Polo Tecnológico de Pando,Facultad de Química,Universidad de la República,By Pass de Rutas 8 y 101 s/n,CP 91000,Pando,Canelones,Uruguay.
Ximena Moratorio4Ministerio de Salud Pública 18 de julio 1892,Montevideo,Uruguay.
Isabel Bove4Ministerio de Salud Pública 18 de julio 1892,Montevideo,Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNutritional warnings have recently been suggested as a simplified front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme to facilitate citizens' ability to identify unhealthful products and discourage their consumption. However, citizens' perspective on this policy is still under-researched. The objective of the present work was to study how citizens perceive nutritional warnings and to evaluate public support of this policy, with the goal of deriving recommendations for the design of policy measures accompanying the introduction of nutritional warnings.

designAn online survey with 1416 Uruguayan citizens, aged 18-75 years, 61 % female, was conducted. Participants had to answer a series of questions (open-ended and multiple-choice) related to their perception of warnings as a front-of-package nutrition labelling scheme.

resultsParticipants showed a positive attitude towards nutritional warnings, which were regarded as easy to understand and to identify on food packages. The majority of respondents emphasized that they would take nutritional warnings into account when making their food choices, stating that they would allow them to make informed choices and, consequently, to increase the quality of their diet and their health status. Health motivation appeared as a crucial driver for taking nutritional warnings into consideration.

conclusionsA high level of public support for nutritional warnings was observed. Responses can be used to derive a range of recommendations for a policy mix that should synergistically support the introduction of nutritional warnings and encourage citizens to take them into account when making their food purchases.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorFood LabelingNutrition PolicyAdolescentAdultAgedFood PreferencesHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUruguayLabellingNutrition informationPublic policyUruguayWarning labels

Identifiers

PMID30156183
PMCPMC10261099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.