ArticleNeuroradiology2018
Developmental venous anomaly depicted incidentally in fetal MRI and confirmed in post-natal MRI.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental venous anomalies on fetal magnetic resonance imaging: prevalence and reproducible radiological phenotypes.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Symptomatic Developmental Venous Anomaly: State-of-the-Art Review on Genetics, Pathophysiology, and Imaging Approach to Diagnosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Review
- Prevalence and anatomical characteristics of developmental venous anomalies: an MRI study.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Neonatal Developmental Venous Anomalies: Clinicoradiologic Characterization and Follow-Up.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Letter regarding "Developmental venous anomaly depicted incidentally in fetal MRI and confirmed in post-natal MRI".Neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Reply: "Developmental venous anomaly depicted incidentally in fetal MRI and confirmed in post-natal MRI".Neuroradiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30155642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.