Genome analysis of the ubiquitous boxwood pathogen

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Genetic basis of Pseudonectria foliicola infection in humans and research on DKP-type natural products.BMC genomics · 2026
   Article
2. Pseudonectria keratitis-emerging pathogenic fungi in the eye.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024
   Article
3. Comparative genomic analysis reveals contraction of gene families with putative roles in pathogenesis in the fungal boxwood pathogens Calonectria henricotiae and C. pseudonaviculata.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022
   Article
4. Comparative genome analyses suggest a hemibiotrophic lifestyle and virulence differences for the beech bark disease fungal pathogens Neonectria faginata and Neonectria coccinea.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as