Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30155242›Full record

ArticleMalaria research and treatment2018

Utilization of Long-Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets and Parasitaemia at 6 Months after a Mass Distribution Exercise among Households in Mbarara Municipality, Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Community Based Study.

Simpson Nuwamanya, Noel Kansiime, Emmanuel Aheebwe, Cecilia Akatukwasa, Harriet Nabulo, Eleanor Turyakira, Francis Bajunirwe

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simpson NuwamanyaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Department of Community Health, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Noel KansiimeMbarara University of Science and Technology, Department of Community Health, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-5584-6121
Emmanuel AheebweMbarara University of Science and Technology, Department of Community Health, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Cecilia AkatukwasaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, P.O. Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Harriet NabuloMbarara University of Science and Technology, Department of Nursing, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Eleanor TuryakiraMbarara University of Science and Technology, Department of Community Health, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Francis BajunirweMbarara University of Science and Technology, Department of Community Health, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-1326-5230
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUtilization of long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) after free and mass distribution exercise has not been adequately studied. The objectives of this study were to assess ownership and utilization of LLINs following a mass distribution campaign in a Ugandan urban municipality.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in western Uganda among households with children under 5 years, at 6 months after a mass LLIN distribution exercise. We administered a questionnaire to measure LLIN ownership and utilization. We also measured parasitaemia among children under five years.

resultsOf the 346 households enrolled, 342 (98.8%) still owned all the LLINs. LLIN use was reported among 315 (91.1%) adult respondents and among 318 (91.9%) children under five. Parasitaemia was detected among 10 (2.9%) children under five. Males (OR=2.65, 95% CI 0.99-7.07), single respondents (OR=10.35, 95% CI 1.64-65.46), having a fitting bed net size (OR= 3.59, 95% CI 1.71-7.59), and no childhood malaria episode reported in the home in the last 12 months (OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.83) were all associated with LLIN use.

conclusionsOwnership of LLIN is very high, and parasitaemia among the children was very low. Low parasitaemia may be attributed to high LLIN utilization. Long term follow-up should be done to determine durability of the ownership and utilization.

Identifiers

PMID30155242
PMCPMC6093084
OpenAlexW2887040485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.